General & Others Next Strawhat Crew Members and the Grand Fleet
- Thread starter Guan Yu
- Start date
- Tags #carrot4prison #furries4carrot #larrot #yamato4nakama #yamatofansunite #yamatoisnakama carrot blows cry about carrot furries for nakama furries scurries i need my support carrot body pillow oni princess and the pirate king this thread stupid we're here for jew vs dizzy who wants rabbit stew yamato > carrot yamato best girl yamato finds the one piece yamato hype yamato is the last crew mate
- Status
To make you blind to the possibility of Otama joining, just write Yamato backwards and it becomes clear. Yamato was always bonding with Momo, it was clear she wasn't going to join if if you payed attention to how she was written.
To have a twist where Robin joined instead. If you payed attention to Vivi's character it was obvious she was staying in alabasta
Please refer back to:
and
Ace told her that when she was 4. Now she's 8 and neither Luffy or Nami of all people mentioned her age being a problem when she asked to join. Tama still wants to go out to sea* is what you meant, that's the reason she wanted to become a kunoichi in the first place.
To have a twist where Robin joined instead. If you payed attention to Vivi's character it was obvious she was staying in alabasta
Please refer back to:
and
Tama's canon role will be pirate apprentice, just like Buggy and Shanks. There's no need for mental gymnastics here, she has always been an apprentice.
But Tama's power works differently from Luffy's CoC. He subjugates their wills with his, but they don't become his slaves and obey every command. Tama's power has shown no limit in number, range or strength of the beast she tames. The only limit is time, that being 1 month. She can order a number of beasts to do complex tasks and go away and they will obey and the her own strength has no influence on the strength of the beasts she can tame, it has a lot more utility than just subjugating a enemy with conqueror's and Luffy agrees.
But Tama's power works differently from Luffy's CoC. He subjugates their wills with his, but they don't become his slaves and obey every command. Tama's power has shown no limit in number, range or strength of the beast she tames. The only limit is time, that being 1 month. She can order a number of beasts to do complex tasks and go away and they will obey and the her own strength has no influence on the strength of the beasts she can tame, it has a lot more utility than just subjugating a enemy with conqueror's and Luffy agrees.
Last edited:
You don't know what answering a question is, right? Did you even understand the question?
Since you are, again, deflecting let's look at your ''answers''.
This is not the answer but a question.i.e: deflecting. Not only that but she was called a red herring since forever. And the question is about creating a plot ploint and not closing it.
Again, not a answer but a question. i.e: deflection. And the point is to show that they are close to Vivi as Nakama but while she loves the crew she loves her country even more. Did you not even read alabasta.
Not a answer to the question. i.e: deflecting. Answering the question: she asked to join and was accepted. In the same way as Jinbe.
This does not answer the question and is deflecting, again. Not only that, in order for someone there must be a character willing to join and Luffy's acceptance.All the names you mentioned aren't willing to join even if Luffy accepts them. Vivi mentioned that she could join later (something that I adressed in my post).
Again,this is another question meant to reflect and that does not answer the question. i.e: deflecting. Again. And as it was answered previously, the difference is because both Luffy and her accepted that she can be a SH. The examples that you used are not the same situation as Tama at all.
True. This does not want the question, thought and does not have anything to do with it.
So, can you answer why Oda decided to make the promise to join instead of ending her story at the end of wano. That was the question that you never answered.
First, this is a question that does not answer what I asked. i.e: deflecting. Second: there's no need to be the best sniper, best doctor and best navigator to become a bewitching kunoichi. Third: Physical strength is not a pre-requisite for kunoichis. Ninjas are about stealth and technique.
This question is not related to what I asked and does not get even close to answer the question. Not only that but it assumes that I said that she will join soon, when anyone that actually read my post knows that I never said that.
So you never answered the question but simply tried to deflect like I stated. Can you answer the question now?
Since you are, again, deflecting let's look at your ''answers''.
This is not the answer but a question.i.e: deflecting. Not only that but she was called a red herring since forever. And the question is about creating a plot ploint and not closing it.
Again, not a answer but a question. i.e: deflection. And the point is to show that they are close to Vivi as Nakama but while she loves the crew she loves her country even more. Did you not even read alabasta.
Not a answer to the question. i.e: deflecting. Answering the question: she asked to join and was accepted. In the same way as Jinbe.
This does not answer the question and is deflecting, again. Not only that, in order for someone there must be a character willing to join and Luffy's acceptance.All the names you mentioned aren't willing to join even if Luffy accepts them. Vivi mentioned that she could join later (something that I adressed in my post).
Again,this is another question meant to reflect and that does not answer the question. i.e: deflecting. Again. And as it was answered previously, the difference is because both Luffy and her accepted that she can be a SH. The examples that you used are not the same situation as Tama at all.
True. This does not want the question, thought and does not have anything to do with it.
So, can you answer why Oda decided to make the promise to join instead of ending her story at the end of wano. That was the question that you never answered.
First, this is a question that does not answer what I asked. i.e: deflecting. Second: there's no need to be the best sniper, best doctor and best navigator to become a bewitching kunoichi. Third: Physical strength is not a pre-requisite for kunoichis. Ninjas are about stealth and technique.
This question is not related to what I asked and does not get even close to answer the question. Not only that but it assumes that I said that she will join soon, when anyone that actually read my post knows that I never said that.
So you never answered the question but simply tried to deflect like I stated. Can you answer the question now?
If Tama ain't doing at least this, she ain't ready to join right now
Tama will unlock the kurozumi clan forbidden jutsu, just you wait.
It's all fun and games until Komachiyo uses the bijuTama
OK now I'm 100% sure what your problem is: you have no idea how examples work. What I'm not sure of is whether you're just slow or doing this on purpose but whatever.
You said, for example, that Tama is different because she asked Luffy and he said yes. My response to this was giving examples of characters asking to join later or given the invite to join later, obviously questioning your logic, and every example I gave is extremely relevant.
1. Are Vivi, Yamato, Kinemon and Momo joining too? If yes, you have explaining to do. If not, what makes Tama so special that she alone gets to join? You follow?
2. Another example is me bringing up the big issue of Tama being too weak, that you for some reason only attribute to physical strength when Nami and Usopp exists. Tama would have to be stronger than Usopp, Nami and Chopper if she is to join, unless Tama gets to be the first character to break the hierarchy.
3. A third example is Tama being an 8 year old kid. Kids were left behind all the time and kept away from those battles as much as possible. We have example after example which would require you to explain why Tama gets to be sole exception.
All these examples and counter arguments that you label as deflection and irrelevant to your points when you're ironically deflecting by saying so.
You said, for example, that Tama is different because she asked Luffy and he said yes. My response to this was giving examples of characters asking to join later or given the invite to join later, obviously questioning your logic, and every example I gave is extremely relevant.
1. Are Vivi, Yamato, Kinemon and Momo joining too? If yes, you have explaining to do. If not, what makes Tama so special that she alone gets to join? You follow?
2. Another example is me bringing up the big issue of Tama being too weak, that you for some reason only attribute to physical strength when Nami and Usopp exists. Tama would have to be stronger than Usopp, Nami and Chopper if she is to join, unless Tama gets to be the first character to break the hierarchy.
3. A third example is Tama being an 8 year old kid. Kids were left behind all the time and kept away from those battles as much as possible. We have example after example which would require you to explain why Tama gets to be sole exception.
All these examples and counter arguments that you label as deflection and irrelevant to your points when you're ironically deflecting by saying so.
I didn't ask for your deflections that you call examples. I asked for a answer to a simple question. A answer is not a example not related to the question or a stupid analogy that does not have anything to do with what was asked. A
Let me show you how to answer a question:
Like I actually answered the answer is no. What makes Tama special is the fact that Luffy accepts her on the crew and she wants to join.
See? is that hard?
About the stupid other things you mentioned:
This is not a question but a assumption. There's nothing to answer here and does not address the question in the slightest.
Again, this is not a question, is not related to the question and is actually incorrect. Roger had both Shanks and Buggy acting as apprentices in his ship at 9 years old. You would have to pick a panel of the crew caring about her age post-Onigashima to have a point (about the issue of age) and again this is not correlated to the question in the slightest.
Again:
Just answer the question. I don't care about what you think are clever examples or whattaboutism. I asked for a answer.
If you can't answer the question that's ok. But don't lie claiming that you did.
Let me show you how to answer a question:
Like I actually answered the answer is no. What makes Tama special is the fact that Luffy accepts her on the crew and she wants to join.
See? is that hard?
About the stupid other things you mentioned:
This is not a question but a assumption. There's nothing to answer here and does not address the question in the slightest.
Again, this is not a question, is not related to the question and is actually incorrect. Roger had both Shanks and Buggy acting as apprentices in his ship at 9 years old. You would have to pick a panel of the crew caring about her age post-Onigashima to have a point (about the issue of age) and again this is not correlated to the question in the slightest.
Again:
Just answer the question. I don't care about what you think are clever examples or whattaboutism. I asked for a answer.
If you can't answer the question that's ok. But don't lie claiming that you did.
Vivi rather rules her kingdom than join, Momo rather rule his kingdom than join, Kin'emon rather stay with his wife than join and Yamato rather explore Wano than join. Tama wants to become a kunoichi in order to join, that's the task Ace set for her. That's one of the many differences that sets her apart.
I don't understand this point. She already has established dynamics with Nami, Ussop and Chopper. Make it the weakling quartet if you want. Her strength is determined by the animals she tames, so as strong as Oda thinks is needed at the time. She is physically weak but can have a very strong partner just like Nami and Zeus.
Why you keep ignoring Buggy and Shanks? They were very close to Tama's age and are a clear parallel as far as the role on the pirate king's ship. Tama even wore Luffy's strawhat like Shanks did Roger's. Whitebeard also had kids on his ship.
I don't understand this point. She already has established dynamics with Nami, Ussop and Chopper. Make it the weakling quartet if you want. Her strength is determined by the animals she tames, so as strong as Oda thinks is needed at the time. She is physically weak but can have a very strong partner just like Nami and Zeus.
Why you keep ignoring Buggy and Shanks? They were very close to Tama's age and are a clear parallel as far as the role on the pirate king's ship. Tama even wore Luffy's strawhat like Shanks did Roger's. Whitebeard also had kids on his ship.
Ok...so matter what I say or how direct I am, you just gonna say I'm deflecting if I argue against Tama.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Ok...so matter what I say or how direct I am, you just gonna say I'm deflecting if I argue against Tama.
I have answered all the points you brought up in the last 3 posts.
Malakhith is also addressing lots of them... posting funny faces will not help you look less BTFO
@Malakhith give up
It was clear he was trolling at the point he started to bring up the "the weakling trio dynamic" and choosing to ignore the existence of Buggy and Shanks.
This
is quite literally this
and a very pathetic excuse for bait.
It was clear he was trolling at the point he started to bring up the "the weakling trio dynamic" and choosing to ignore the existence of Buggy and Shanks.
This
is quite literally this
and a very pathetic excuse for bait.
Again, lying. Let's prove it so you can concede.
Question:
Your first answer:
Not a answer.
Question:
Your second answer:
Yeah. This is not even related to the question.
Question:
Your third answer:
Not a answer and actually looks like whining.
Question:
Your 4th answer:
It does not even have anything to do with what was asked.
Question:
Your 5th answer:
Yeah. Nothing to do what was asked. Again.
Question:
Your 6th answer:
Not even close to what was asked. Again
Question:
Your final ''answe'r'':
Also does not addres what was asked.
Your never answered the question. It's easy to prove just putting your so called ''answers'' below the actual question. So stop lying claiming that you answered when you didn't.
I'm going to sleep. The guy lies so much that it is a waste of time.
Good night.
Question:
Your first answer:
Not a answer.
Question:
Your second answer:
Yeah. This is not even related to the question.
Question:
Your third answer:
Not a answer and actually looks like whining.
Question:
Your 4th answer:
It does not even have anything to do with what was asked.
Question:
Your 5th answer:
Yeah. Nothing to do what was asked. Again.
Question:
Your 6th answer:
Not even close to what was asked. Again
Question:
Your final ''answe'r'':
Also does not addres what was asked.
Your never answered the question. It's easy to prove just putting your so called ''answers'' below the actual question. So stop lying claiming that you answered when you didn't.
Post automatically merged:
@Malakhith give up
It was clear he was trolling at the point he started to bring up the "the weakling trio dynamic" and choosing to ignore the existence of Buggy and Shanks.
This
is quite literally this
and a very pathetic excuse for bait.
It was clear he was trolling at the point he started to bring up the "the weakling trio dynamic" and choosing to ignore the existence of Buggy and Shanks.
This
is quite literally this
and a very pathetic excuse for bait.
Good night.
- Status