Future Events Akainu and Blackbeard are destined to lose together

Luffy isn't gonna fight Akainu to avenge Ace
He hasn't even mentioned avenging Ace ever since he came into NW
He doesn't even think of Akainu

It's only Sabo who wanna avenge Ace and be there this time when Luffy fights WG again

Akainu isn't like Teach and Imu
Those 2 are the main villains of this final saga, Akainu defeat won't change the world, they can replace him whenever they want.
 
W
Luffy isn't gonna fight Akainu to avenge Ace
He hasn't even mentioned avenging Ace ever since he came into NW
He doesn't even think of Akainu

It's only Sabo who wanna avenge Ace and be there this time when Luffy fights WG again

Akainu isn't like Teach and Imu
Those 2 are the main villains of this final saga, Akainu defeat won't change the world, they can replace him whenever they want.
What's funny is these dudes get so defensive over the "replaceable general comments" Paperchampion23 says he doesn't have an agenda but got triggered by that.

Yes. Yonko. Admiral. They are replaceable.

However, we know the gorosei have reigned since Kong was FA. Imu is the obvious case.

Nobody has given a good explanation as to why VP looks young in his meeting with the elders....but why Blonde gorosei looks middle aged still
 
Last edited:
W


What's funny is these dudes get so defensive over the "replaceable general comments" Paperchampion23 says he doesn't have an agenda but got triggered by that.

Yes. Yonko. Admiral. They are replaceable.

However, we know the gorosei have reigned since Kong was FA. Imu is the obvious case.

Nobody has given a good explanation as to why VP looks young in his meeting with the elders....but why Blonde gorosei looks middle aged still
People really think Akainu is as important as Teach and Imu are
They also love shanks so much that they believe he's gonna outlast Teach and Imu

Some even believe CG will be the last enemies of SHs before the final war
 
Oda "When a scar aches it is because a fateful enemy is around/mentioned"

RtlTR "Shanks's scar ties his fate to Blackbeard"

Illiterate fans "sAbO vS AkAinU"

We'll let them cope anyway since Oda bodied so hard with the Reverie flashback and even went his way out to put a target on his back ith the Holy Knights, a group of characters designed specifically to be foils to the RA
 
Oda "When a scar aches it is because a fateful enemy is around/mentioned"

RtlTR "Shanks's scar ties his fate to Blackbeard"

Illiterate fans "sAbO vS AkAinU"

We'll let them cope anyway since Oda bodied so hard with the Reverie flashback and even went his way out to put a target on his back ith the Holy Knights, a group of characters designed specifically to be foils to the RA
Akainu not being the main villain really triggers a lot of people lol
 
What makes you think I'm triggered?
I just view it as laughable since people like you were also saying Luffy would not fight against Kizaru just a few weeks ago lmfao.
Now. What do you think Luffy is going to do to Kizaru lol.

Luffy has already probably surpassed Akainu.
Post automatically merged:

Mind you. Luffy won't take 10 days or get a scar lol
 
Last edited:
W


What's funny is these dudes get so defensive over the "replaceable general comments" Paperchampion23 says he doesn't have an agenda but got triggered by that.

Yes. Yonko. Admiral. They are replaceable.

However, we know the gorosei have reigned since Kong was FA. Imu is the obvious case.

Nobody has given a good explanation as to why VP looks young in his meeting with the elders....but why Blonde gorosei looks middle aged still
"Triggered" yet you continue to argue in bad faith. Said you are "done" but then continue to talk about me without a tag because you dont want me to quote you lmao

And please, @JoNdule knows perfectly well that what he's arguing makes absolutely no sense because Sabo, not once, has uttered the word Akainu in this story lmao. He also straight up lies about Luffy not caring about Akainu post TS when Luffy, quite literally grabs his chest scar when his name is mentioned in Fishman Island.

You tell me im "biased" and "have an agenda", yet your clear brown nosing for Blackbeard and evident disdain for Akainu just tells me what you are going for here. You arent that slick bro
Post automatically merged:

Oda "When a scar aches it is because a fateful enemy is around/mentioned"

RtlTR "Shanks's scar ties his fate to Blackbeard"

Illiterate fans "sAbO vS AkAinU"

We'll let them cope anyway since Oda bodied so hard with the Reverie flashback and even went his way out to put a target on his back ith the Holy Knights, a group of characters designed specifically to be foils to the RA
@Extravlad Hell, add Shanks to the threesome and make it a four way :steef::steef:

Fight of course:endthis:
 
"Triggered" yet you continue to argue in bad faith. Said you are "done" but then continue to talk about me without a tag because you dont want me to quote you lmao

And please, @JoNdule knows perfectly well that what he's arguing makes absolutely no sense because Sabo, not once, has uttered the word Akainu in this story lmao. He also straight up lies about Luffy not caring about Akainu post TS when Luffy, quite literally grabs his chest scar when his name is mentioned in Fishman Island.

You tell me im "biased" and "have an agenda", yet your clear brown nosing for Blackbeard and evident disdain for Akainu just tells me what you are going for here. You arent that slick bro
Again. It all goes back the the solar system.

Blackbeard is potentially the moon.

If he isn't. Whatever.

The main important people have all been outlined.

It's Shirahoshi, Luffy, Imu and the gorosei.

If Blackbeard isn't the moon, then he is as unimportant as Akainu in the grand scheme of things.

FYI, I even made a topic suggesting it's the gorosei and imu who are the finale.
 
Again. It all goes back the the solar system.

Blackbeard is potentially the moon.
Literally nothing to do with the conversation. We are talking about Akainu, Luffy and Sabo.

Also.....lol
Post automatically merged:

BB vs Luffy will be one on one.
@MonsterKaido people are misunderstanding the intent of the thread. Its not that Luffy takes out both in a 1v2 because he's god. Its that a big war is potentially happening (i.e. marineford but 10x longer) and the main players of it can fall there.

The idea Im posing comes from narrative pulls I found (they both triggered caused the major deaths in the last war, both are featured in Chapter 650 as the BIG timeskip changes, etc), and Im just suggesting the idea that they may "lose" together (as in, at separate points while fighting everyone else, but both still 1v1s to Luffy in the end).


The big question is primarily escalation, because how do you keep escalating to from Kaido to Kizaru to Elbaf's villain to Akainu to Blackbeard to Imu (fit Shanks where you want, no argument needed there) if we are "close" the endgame of the story? Its way too much to individually scale escalation 4-5 more times. We barely got through 3 villains for example (Doffy, Kata, Kaido) in 350 chapters.
 
Last edited:
And it's agenda to act as if Akainu is fighting Luffy

What happens if Luffy absolutely murders Kizaru here?
No, its not. Its not agenda for the Main Character to fight the head of the Marines that is the only person who scarred him and killed his brother in front of him. It IS agenda to downplay this character and act like Sabo has any bearing to fight him though.

Once again, hypocrite. And Kizaru and Akainu are not equal lmfao. You should know this by now.
 
No, its not. Its not agenda for the Main Character to fight the head of the Marines that is the only person who scarred him and killed his brother in front of him. It IS agenda to downplay this character and act like Sabo has any bearing to fight him though.

Once again, hypocrite. And Kizaru and Akainu are not equal lmfao. You should know this by now.
Kizaru is one of the c3 and refers to Sakazuki as an equal. Hence why no honorifics.

It's not the case with Aramaki who refers to Sakazuki in a higher tone.

Again. Sakazuki takes 10 days to beat a fellow admiral.

What if Luffy takes one out in like 10 minutes?

There is absolutely 0 way people aren't going to wank that feat like no tomorrow lol
 
Kizaru is one of the c3 and refers to Sakazuki as an equal. Hence why no honorifics.

It's not the case with Aramaki who refers to Sakazuki in a higher tone.

Again. Sakazuki takes 10 days to beat a fellow admiral.

What if Luffy takes one out in like 10 minutes?

There is absolutely 0 way people aren't going to wank that feat like no tomorrow lol
Nobody refers to Luffy with honorifics. Nobody refers to Blackbeard with honorifics (save for fodder). The only person that received anything like this was Shanks being called Kashira or Boss. Thats it.

Dont empoly headcanon to this, Kizaru still listens to Sakazuki and his commands. Its the one thing he actually does lmao. And they were all the same rank pre-TS, so no.

And already headcanoning Luffy vs Kizaru I see. I smell the lamebrain agenda from your ass a mile away bro.

Thought you were done yesterday:milaugh:. Imagine using "honorifics" to try and powerscale lmfao
 
Nobody refers to Luffy with honorifics. Nobody refers to Blackbeard with honorifics (save for fodder). The only person that received anything like this was Shanks being called Kashira or Boss. Thats it.

Dont empoly headcanon to this, Kizaru still listens to Sakazuki and his commands. Its the one thing he actually does lmao. And they were all the same rank pre-TS, so no.

And already headcanoning Luffy vs Kizaru I see. I smell the lamebrain agenda from your ass a mile away bro.

Thought you were done yesterday:milaugh:. Imagine using "honorifics" to try and powerscale lmfao
Blackbeard is literally called the commodore/admiral. Wtf. Even Lafitte corrected Burgess I think for that.

And if you really want to go there, then yeah. Blackbeard is considered the strongest member of the BBP. "The commodore is the greatest" and orders Kuzan around.
 
Top