far right is generally used as a shaming term for typically just everyday conservative pundits say peterson,sharpiro and so on
Sorry mate, those definitely far right, even crypto fascist for some.
dont buy into your narrative of the world being ran by bunch of extreme right wing nazi's
No, that's YOUR narrative. What I say that the world is directed by liberals and pro capitalist.
That's your problem, you never listen..
same general ideas and social positions
Nop not at all. Unless you are ignorant about the nature of the political spectrum and differences between the value systems.
most of them lean left or are liberal if term makes you feel better
Liberal yes, not left.
But since you don't understand/still refuse the to understand the difference between leftists and liberal, I guess you will never open your eyes on this matter
hate that your so autistic about terms
There is a reason why liberal=/=leftism. I already explained that multiple times to you and you refuse to understand or even listen. Keep your psychophobia away please.
if x person holds x set of positions be it pro abortion,femminsm,blm or whatever
that's what defines you being right wing or left
Not necessaraly no.
there's two parties, one made for the conservatives and the other for liberals/leftists
No, there are indeed two party but its rightist VS leftist. And liberalism is not on the side of leftism. Its - again - just a progressive version of rightism.
you wanna embody that whilie at the same time pretty much holding the exact poltics of the monarchy
No, but you can call me Robin Hood if you want to, I like the title.
is the misunderstanding in your mind that said groups are leftist or that they status quo
There is indeed a missunderstanding, but its not in my mind mate :cheers:
im saying im opposed to teaching woke,sjw or leftism to kids
You don't want kid to learn about science ?
he actively censors the right
Maybe now yes, that's not what your article was
I can write a book about Biden's racism and how it's affected my family directly.
I think this is not "Biden's racism" but the overall systemic racism you are referring to. Biden is just not doing much about it that's all (same as Trump)
Yeah thats once again nice fanfiction bruh.
Well thats the claim, and you have me scources that make claims, thats it. Its a reach to even call it a movement. Much lesd a belief system lmao.
Oh but its a real social movement. In fact the New atheism can also be found in France under a different name with similar vision of science and the same negligeance of socials sciences and political issues.
You never argued his words at all, you immediately went for the character, and that in a fallacious dishonest way too.
Yes I did when we talked about Eugenism. And now I'm EXTENDING the critic to the character himself. And this is a perfectly legitimate critic.
Again, you are confusing adhominem/personam with the legitimate critic of an individual's path. ADhominem/personam are just fallacies when they are used to redirect the debate away from the subject, not when we make an actual analysis of an individual's path.
You imagine if Historian weren't able to make critical descriptions about historical personnalities's path ? Cut the nonsense please.
Nah im not, this is all antilogical drivel.
Again not surprised though
Like I said: The fact of not subscribing to any ideologies means that you won't take a side when it come to defend basic ethical ideologies like the defense of minorities or the oppressed for the sake of "not taking a side". This is one of the parameters that separates right wingers from left wingers. Sorry.
Not the point at all and i have said as much in the past lmao
Yes it is.
Thats not what scientism is used to mean
No indeed, the reorganisation of the society through science is an idea of scientism and society that appeared with Saint-Simon during the 19' century. Dawkins is just taken and reforming back this ideology.
and that wouldnt be even be true for the supposed "new atheists" either. Sam harris of the four horseman is probably the only one claiming science can make statements about morality.
Well that's not what analyst say about the subject.
https://theconversation.com/why-the...s-are-often-just-as-violent-as-religion-95185
unless its about compromising science or basic defitions of words
Not really no as you prefer academic definition over scientific ones.
No that's not how it works
Sadly that's precisely how it works.
The inaction in front of oppression is a parameter of conservatism.
Trump's policies have helped them.
Not really no.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/01/trump-black-americans-policies-433744
Women with Zemmour
Thaïs d'Escufon
