Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You never argued his words at all, you immediately went for the character, and that in a fallacious dishonest way too.
Nah im not, this is all antilogical drivel.
Again not surprised though
Not the point at all and i have said as much in the past lmao
Thats not what scientism is used to mean, and that wouldnt be even be true for the supposed "new atheists" either. Sam harris of the four horseman is probably the only one claiming science can make statements about morality.
Im fairly progressive, unless its about compromising science or basic defitions of words. And i dont like political correctness. Truth > the feelings of strangers.
Because he isnt an establishment politician. They did him dirty two times in a row and he still considers these shits his friends. Too nice a guy for his own good sadly. . .
So, basic human rights?!
Great thing
Dont know all that much bou maher. With dawkins it depends on who he is talking to
Post automatically merged:
In short, you are right wing.
When one don't subscribe to any ideology, it means that one will not follow ethical ideologies. Meaning that one will therefore not fight for those ideologies. In short: One is a rightist.
Its okay to be a right winger.. its not an insult, but its better when you accept yourself as you are.
When one don't subscribe to any ideology, it means that one will not follow ethical ideologies. Meaning that one will therefore not fight for those ideologies. In short: One is a rightist.
Its okay to be a right winger.. its not an insult, but its better when you accept yourself as you are.
Again not surprised though
Post automatically merged:
Not the point at all and i have said as much in the past lmao
Post automatically merged:
Thats not what scientism is used to mean, and that wouldnt be even be true for the supposed "new atheists" either. Sam harris of the four horseman is probably the only one claiming science can make statements about morality.
Post automatically merged:
Im fairly progressive, unless its about compromising science or basic defitions of words. And i dont like political correctness. Truth > the feelings of strangers.
Post automatically merged:
Because he isnt an establishment politician. They did him dirty two times in a row and he still considers these shits his friends. Too nice a guy for his own good sadly. . .
Post automatically merged:
So, basic human rights?!
Post automatically merged:
Great thing
Post automatically merged:
Dont know all that much bou maher. With dawkins it depends on who he is talking to
Last edited:
That's how these types catch their followers, by saying some basic things that everyone knows and say something intellectual.
No that's not how it works😒
I'm probably more religious than 80% of those "cONseRvATiVeS" who made religion their whole identity :saden:
many of these guys notice stuff but they draw all the wrong conclusions and believe in all the wrong, self destructive "solutions". We can't save them my bunny. Don't waste your time.
It's a big problem that some people only see and care about themselves and saving their own skin, they cant (or don't want to) see the bigger picture and the root caused of problems.
I see your point lol
In high school we were force fed Dawkins and the likes, I never liked him
No that's not how it works😒
I'm probably more religious than 80% of those "cONseRvATiVeS" who made religion their whole identity :saden:
many of these guys notice stuff but they draw all the wrong conclusions and believe in all the wrong, self destructive "solutions". We can't save them my bunny. Don't waste your time.
It's a big problem that some people only see and care about themselves and saving their own skin, they cant (or don't want to) see the bigger picture and the root caused of problems.
I see your point lol
In high school we were force fed Dawkins and the likes, I never liked him
And I disagree with that statement. Biden has only created policies that hurt the minorities of the United States and Trump's policies have helped them. Including when he undid one of the most racist laws that Biden helped write where it gave mostly black men unfair sentences.
It's been fun, but after today I likely will be released back to work and be busy again.
Post automatically merged:
It's been fun, but after today I likely will be released back to work and be busy again.
Honestly, the best thing the left did for Trump was push all the phony charges on him. It has resonated with people who feel like the law system has unjustly punished them. That's why you have seen videos of people of all races taking to the streets demanding to free him.
It's also how he went from unelectable to having a high chance of being elected.
I don't know what that means lol.
It's also how he went from unelectable to having a high chance of being elected.
Post automatically merged:
Women with Zemmour 
Sorry mate, those definitely far right, even crypto fascist for some.
No, that's YOUR narrative. What I say that the world is directed by liberals and pro capitalist.
That's your problem, you never listen..
Nop not at all. Unless you are ignorant about the nature of the political spectrum and differences between the value systems.
Liberal yes, not left.
But since you don't understand/still refuse the to understand the difference between leftists and liberal, I guess you will never open your eyes on this matter
There is a reason why liberal=/=leftism. I already explained that multiple times to you and you refuse to understand or even listen. Keep your psychophobia away please.
Not necessaraly no.
No, there are indeed two party but its rightist VS leftist. And liberalism is not on the side of leftism. Its - again - just a progressive version of rightism.
No, but you can call me Robin Hood if you want to, I like the title.
There is indeed a missunderstanding, but its not in my mind mate :cheers:
You don't want kid to learn about science ?
Maybe now yes, that's not what your article was
I think this is not "Biden's racism" but the overall systemic racism you are referring to. Biden is just not doing much about it that's all (same as Trump)
Oh but its a real social movement. In fact the New atheism can also be found in France under a different name with similar vision of science and the same negligeance of socials sciences and political issues.
Yes I did when we talked about Eugenism. And now I'm EXTENDING the critic to the character himself. And this is a perfectly legitimate critic.
Again, you are confusing adhominem/personam with the legitimate critic of an individual's path. ADhominem/personam are just fallacies when they are used to redirect the debate away from the subject, not when we make an actual analysis of an individual's path.
You imagine if Historian weren't able to make critical descriptions about historical personnalities's path ? Cut the nonsense please.
Like I said: The fact of not subscribing to any ideologies means that you won't take a side when it come to defend basic ethical ideologies like the defense of minorities or the oppressed for the sake of "not taking a side". This is one of the parameters that separates right wingers from left wingers. Sorry.
Yes it is.
No indeed, the reorganisation of the society through science is an idea of scientism and society that appeared with Saint-Simon during the 19' century. Dawkins is just taken and reforming back this ideology.
Well that's not what analyst say about the subject.
https://theconversation.com/why-the...s-are-often-just-as-violent-as-religion-95185
Not really no as you prefer academic definition over scientific ones.
Sadly that's precisely how it works.
The inaction in front of oppression is a parameter of conservatism.
Not really no.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/01/trump-black-americans-policies-433744
Thaïs d'Escufon 
No, that's YOUR narrative. What I say that the world is directed by liberals and pro capitalist.
That's your problem, you never listen..
Nop not at all. Unless you are ignorant about the nature of the political spectrum and differences between the value systems.
Liberal yes, not left.
But since you don't understand/still refuse the to understand the difference between leftists and liberal, I guess you will never open your eyes on this matter
There is a reason why liberal=/=leftism. I already explained that multiple times to you and you refuse to understand or even listen. Keep your psychophobia away please.
Not necessaraly no.
No, there are indeed two party but its rightist VS leftist. And liberalism is not on the side of leftism. Its - again - just a progressive version of rightism.
No, but you can call me Robin Hood if you want to, I like the title.
There is indeed a missunderstanding, but its not in my mind mate :cheers:
You don't want kid to learn about science ?
Maybe now yes, that's not what your article was
I think this is not "Biden's racism" but the overall systemic racism you are referring to. Biden is just not doing much about it that's all (same as Trump)
Oh but its a real social movement. In fact the New atheism can also be found in France under a different name with similar vision of science and the same negligeance of socials sciences and political issues.
Yes I did when we talked about Eugenism. And now I'm EXTENDING the critic to the character himself. And this is a perfectly legitimate critic.
Again, you are confusing adhominem/personam with the legitimate critic of an individual's path. ADhominem/personam are just fallacies when they are used to redirect the debate away from the subject, not when we make an actual analysis of an individual's path.
You imagine if Historian weren't able to make critical descriptions about historical personnalities's path ? Cut the nonsense please.
Like I said: The fact of not subscribing to any ideologies means that you won't take a side when it come to defend basic ethical ideologies like the defense of minorities or the oppressed for the sake of "not taking a side". This is one of the parameters that separates right wingers from left wingers. Sorry.
Yes it is.No indeed, the reorganisation of the society through science is an idea of scientism and society that appeared with Saint-Simon during the 19' century. Dawkins is just taken and reforming back this ideology.
Well that's not what analyst say about the subject.
https://theconversation.com/why-the...s-are-often-just-as-violent-as-religion-95185
Not really no as you prefer academic definition over scientific ones.
Sadly that's precisely how it works.
The inaction in front of oppression is a parameter of conservatism.
Not really no.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/01/trump-black-americans-policies-433744
Women with Zemmour