Ok. Since its calm here, I will come back on a few things that have been said during the last week, because I won't feel good if I say nothing. I've a new
TOOL now.. so its should be a little bit easier.
And since I'm talking about it. I added a new video to the library. This should make you understand why leftists, feminist and LGBTI+ militants are actually not really appreciating the "woke caricatures" in medias:
and "muslims" still dont constitute a race, so that has barely anything to do with what i said anyway:
THIS VIDEO should make you understand why, while muslims are indeed not a race, they are considered sociologically as a racialized group.
You will find more ressources about the systemic oppression of muslim and "Islamophobia"
HERE.
not sure what their reasons are for being against the construction of mosques though, i will inquire into that next time the topic arises
The reason is simple. The fear of Islam and the assimilation of Islamist actions to all Muslims. The fear of creating mosquees coming from new atheists like Dawkins or the far right is based on this. And this particular hate is based on the racist complotist theory of the "great replacement" - once a antisemitic theory, now an islamophobic one. The new atheists are simply following the toxic weaknesses of their ideology being a big lack of understanding for the political reality of the world and therefore a great deal of ignorance about sociology, minorities and the place of religion in all of this.
There would be no surprise if Dawkins and Cie start to ally themselves with far right personnalities in the future. It would be a logical continuation of their path.
You can't have freedom if you have closed borders. Lol.
Interesting. I predict you becoming an anarcho-communist in the next decade or so if you get rid of your political biases. I might be wrong, but you seems to be motivated enough to search and understand the reality of meritocracy in the near future which should be rocketing you directly toward this specific ideology.
Easy to say when is not your country being attacked by people that are brainwashed go hate you since birth.
Aaaannnd the light is gone. Yes they do. In fact most Israelian are raised in a systemic hatred of Palestinians. You might wanna search about the way Israel educate young people about the nature and rights of Palestinians mate. I don't think you really understanding correctly who is educating who in a fascist way...
Please watch
THIS VIDEO and you should understand the
surface of the problem
A genocide where the people being genocided actually increases?
A genocide is not the act of eleminating necessary the entire group, a genocide can be done on a very specific number of people.
Please read and PAY ATTENTION to the definition of
THIS LINK to understand why you are saying nonsence.
Racial slur is not the same as racism.
Yes it is. Racial slurs are the language manifestation of racism (or the fight against it, if we talk about the use of the N world of black people)
There wasn't a sovereign government protecting it borders with laws to regulate immigration.
There were a lot of nations and therefore forms of gouvernments. The fact that Abya Yala! was the considered the propriety of all doesn't change the fact that the europeean accaparated the land by force without permission and forced slavery and migrations on people thus creating multiple ethnical cleansing and a genocide.
There wasn’t a state and the continent was barely populated lol. Did we really steal anything? Maybe during the ethnic cleanings since we agreed to share the land with the natives after the creation of the US
70 Millions of people were decimated.
ALL OVER ABYA YALA!
Let's not forget about them
1. The Americas was only recently populated. C
Recently is a relative term. The migration in Europe started around 45000 years ago while there are traces of population in America as soon as 30000 years ago.
More info
HERE and
HERE (its not the library, that's just basic anthropology)
So this is really no reason to bring this up when we are talking about the genocide of the natives by Europeans.
Compared to Europe the population of the new world was largely small
You can't have freedom if you have closed borders. Lol.
Interesting. I predict you becoming an anarcho-communist in the next decade or so if you get rid of your political biases. I might be wrong, but you seems to be motivated enough to search and understand the reality of meritocracy in the near future which should be rocketing you directly toward this specific ideology.
In reality the number vary largerly between researchs (sometime around 50 Millions, sometimes well over 100 M people). This is why I would be more enclined to follow the
WORK of Moema Viezzer and Marcelo grondin that demonstrate through the use of mutliple researches that there were at least
70 MILLIONS out of (82 Millions) people killed or purposefully contaminated (and killed) during the genocide of the colonization of Abya Yala!
And there were between
70 and 75 Millions of people in Europe in between 1492 and 1650. So technically, there were more people in the big continent than in Europe.
But 50 or 100 Millions wouldn't change the fact that:
- This was the biggest genocide in history
- This was done by Europpean who appropriated something that wasn't theirs
Yes. Im not big on inherent claim to land. By that logic all of Europe was stolen from other ethnic groups and you don’t see them bitching
and what I said is 100% true. America was a largely uninhabited land by the time the colonies were being established. The natives were mostly killed off by disease way before this land was established
Step 1: Eradicate and genocide almost the entirerity of the population of a territory
Step 2 : Notice that the eradication created a huge human-free landmass
Step 3: Claim the "uninhabited land"
Ladies and gentlemen...
The European way
That requires a brief look back at history, or more specially, a history of the Religious Right and the wall between religion and state. Before we dive in, lemme preface this by saying the goal of the Right wingers in power is to scare the shit out of the population so that they show up to the polls and vote. Republicans and the right love using minorities as sacrifices for the sake of gaining or maintaining their power.
Back in the early 1900s, a woman named Aimee McPherson became the first televangelist and founded the first mega church. Her rhetoric was that America was a white Christian nation, and it was under attack by non-white and non-Christian people. That if someone doesn't become a Christian which is the core of American values, they are not welcomed. The fear mongering lead to strong anti immigration sentiment, strengthened eugenics and Jim crow laws, deported many immigrants, and Latinos were no longer considered white.
During the 60s-1980, the Religous Right became turning their attention from African-Americans(because they gained civil rights so they lost) and more to gay people. Greatly influenced by Anita Bryant, they started claiming homosexuality was mental illness(sound familiar?), that they were inherently sexual deviants(sound familiar?), that they were after children(sound familiar?), and were infiltrating education to groom kids and convert them to the gay agenda(sound familiar?). Despite being blatant lies, it caused massive outrage and many anti-gay legislations were voted for and passed, pushing gay rights back decades. However, when Barack Obama made same sex marriage legal and protected gay rights, the right in power was pissed because they lost one of their best fear mongering tools, and the religious right(the people), got into a frenzy and flocked to their new savior Donald Trump. In 2016, trans people started to become the new sacrifice for moral panic to get votes.
Brief and details being left out, we have decades of religious and nationalistic propaganda being given to people, making them believe minority groups are the issue. Trump's talk of Christian values, anti-immigration, patriotism, anti-trans and protecting the youth made him their God.
Because the democratic party does the same thing. They use outrage to get minorities to vote for them but still push right wing legislation most of the time.
You really have a good economical and historical knowledge and you understand the problem with republicans, conservative and liberals. I really don't understand why you keep believing in meritocracy and have still not turned woke/full leftist yet.
You are sooooooooo close