Who will be the 47th President of the United States of America?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
So instead of sticking to the universal definition, we should instead listen to the made up versions for each individual person. Brilliant!
No. You should listen to this definition, its a good one. Its just not complete. Meritocracy is more than just a political system its a failed social structure in every aspect of society.

if you want a more broad explanation of the concept, you can read this encyclopedic article on wiki about Meritocracy. It much more complete and if you want to really understand why meritocracy is not working again > Leftist library section sociology.

That video is essential (that's why its in Yellow):


What you must understand (and sadly I did not find good content explaining this in English as of today) is that the vision of Kant, Meritocracy, is what gave birth to liberalism and liberalism can be traced back in each and every aspect of our daily life.

For example:


Liberalism and meritocracy are the IDEALIST vision of human nature and the idealistic vision that we are in full control of our action, emotion and situation and that we can therefore better our situation by bettering ourselves. In the majority of the case, this is not how reality works.

We should strive to do our best, but we simply can't become billionaires or CEO with just hard work, there needs to be more. And that's where the notion of capitals is important. (video 1). We might be lucky and get out of our social class one step further, but those cases are rare. Poor will mostly stay poor and rich will always stay rich.

Its important to understand the concept of social mobility.
https://www.oecd.org/stories/social-mobility/

We can change that. But for that, we must fight together, not alone.
 
Solis, please refrain from speaking to me. I'm not interested in reading your annoying comments. Nothing about what you write matters in anyway.
Post automatically merged:

SMH, North Face has a Camp for kids to explore their sexuality.
Tell me your grooming kids without telling me your grooming kids.

They're so targeting kids, It's undeniable at this point.
 
Last edited:
And that the problem. Like Zenos, you are sticking to the definition.

The political sociology and reality of meritocracy is not limited to this definition. Meritocracy, just like Transphobia or Systemic Racism or Patriarchy can be seen in a larger area.

For example:

- Systemic racism can be seen against Asian American in the form of positive discrimination.
- Transphobia can be seen in a feminist calling a Trans women a man
- Patriarchy can be seen through some of the struggles of men in society
- The myth of Meritocracy can be observed in the way towns are constructed and/or abandonned.




Dude, if you think that I'm depressed and that I think that there is no much that can be done to better my or our condition, you are delusionnal.

Really... just observe the way i'm acting on this forum. Do you feel like this is the words of a sad and defeated leftist with no will power ?

:snoopy:
The whole point of having words and definitions is to have an universal understanding, language it’s pointless without it.

for example, everyone understands hello is a greeting. If you suddenly decide to use hello to dismiss people you’ll just end up confusing every person you talk to.

You’re just confusing everyone when you ignore the commonly understood meaning of words and use your own.

Also yes you do give off that stereotype in that conversation with Van.
 
The whole point of having words and definitions is to have an universal understanding, language it’s pointless without it.

for example, everyone understands hello is a greeting. If you suddenly decide to use hello to dismiss people you’ll just end up confusing every person you talk to.

You’re just confusing everyone when you ignore the commonly understood meaning of words and use your own.

Also yes you do give off that stereotype in that conversation with Van.
Did you read Apel or Habermas?
 
like, is this video the whole campaign?? Where is the part that targets children and showing their sexuality?
From what I read in the article, it's just a pride themed campaign. It's just virtue signaling, that's all there is to it. But my guy here is so retarded he thinks there's this huge conspiracy to turn all children gay for reasons???
 
The whole point of having words and definitions is to have an universal understanding, language it’s pointless without it.
Yes. And the definition works. But its can't explain everything. The concept of meritocracy is a deep subject that a definition is just not enough to translate in its entiererity. Its really not complicated. Just basic sociology.


You’re just confusing everyone when you ignore the commonly understood meaning of words and use your own.
No. I use the term as it is used in the definition and the encyclopedic explanation. Both of them. Its not difficult to understand. If you are confused, which is ok (meritocracy is not necessarally an easy political concept to grasp in its entierity), I proposed content to understand it more in the library. If that's not enough, you can check sociological works or the encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy


Also yes you do give off that stereotype in that conversation with Van.
No. i've just very politically precise when I'm talking. You need to understand completely what Meritocracy means as a political structure and its impacts on every day life. Which is why I made the leftist library in the first place.

I can't expect rightist to understand the problem with meritocracy on the get go, so please, watch those content first. Especially this video, Its extremely important:


like, is this video the whole campaign?? Where is the part that targets children and showing their sexuality?
I think they are just moral panicking because its a "pride" camp.
 
From what I read in the article, it's just a pride themed campaign. It's just virtue signaling, that's all there is to it. But my guy here is so retarded he thinks there's this huge conspiracy to turn all children gay for reasons???
Right so apparently there's a LGBT summer camp this company has been donating to for a few years.

In other news, check this out and use Google translate:
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarete#Kultur a town with 10 genders :suresure: @Logiko @Ravagerblade
Post automatically merged:

In Amarete everything has a gender, be it people, fields, mountains, objects, offices or rituals. In addition to the two biological genders, people's social gender depends on the gender of their field (wachu gender) and the office they may hold. By combining the two biological sexes with 5 symbolic genders (simple male, female-female, male-female and female-male, male-male), 10 different gender roles result
There's only 2 genders they said. Only biology matters they said :saden::saden:
Post automatically merged:

“These gender roles play a large role in religion, ritual and everyday life. They determine the order of sitting, walking and acting, the so-called corner and hospitality order and, above all, the complex order of sacrifices in the ritual. By taking on an office, a person’s gender can change, because offices also have a symbolic gender – just like space, time and matter.”
 
Last edited:
The gender of the field results from a sexual symbolization of time and space. For example, older fields are male and younger fields are female.[7] In most cases it has a double gender. Offices in the village community also have a gender and when taking on one, the Wachu gender (“field gender”) must be given up for the duration of the office. Since the village authorities change every year, the officials and subsequently their spouses often undergo a gender change. Depending on the constellation of the existing gender, a change may also be necessary when getting married. Same are considered cheap. In the rituals, concepts from the Andean religion are intertwined with Christian elements and symbolic sexuality in a variety of ways.
 
Top