Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem loli real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Why would it be ? Having an identity doesn't necessarally mean that you understand everything about the fight related to this identity.
A black transwomen could simply be no aware of all the leftist fights (present in my library), that's very unlikely but its possible so I do not use identity to say that one person is a good leftist or not. I'm only looking at their ideology.
If a black trans women is supporting the meritocracy and other rightist ideologies, then she will be a rightist, not a leftist.
Everyone is not racist and sexist most of the time, what is important to understand is that we all have racist and sexist bias. That's what I mean when I say that we are all sexist and racist because of our education.
Where do you see that ?
Your pro-capitalist fallacious rethoric is convincing no one mate
The first step in understanding language is to understand that it evolves and sticking to dictionnary definition while missunderstanding historical context is big problem
Its a scientific consensus mate. Time to wake up. (And if you start saying to me "only in your bias science" then you are missunderstanding and missinterprating what science is to begin with. If you don't understand that social sciences are part of science, its time to grow up.)
A black transwomen could simply be no aware of all the leftist fights (present in my library), that's very unlikely but its possible so I do not use identity to say that one person is a good leftist or not. I'm only looking at their ideology.
If a black trans women is supporting the meritocracy and other rightist ideologies, then she will be a rightist, not a leftist.
Everyone is not racist and sexist most of the time, what is important to understand is that we all have racist and sexist bias. That's what I mean when I say that we are all sexist and racist because of our education.
Where do you see that ?
Your pro-capitalist fallacious rethoric is convincing no one mate
The first step in understanding language is to understand that it evolves and sticking to dictionnary definition while missunderstanding historical context is big problem
Its a scientific consensus mate. Time to wake up. (And if you start saying to me "only in your bias science" then you are missunderstanding and missinterprating what science is to begin with. If you don't understand that social sciences are part of science, its time to grow up.)
Your concensus can and is wrong bub. Even if there have been certain issues regarding race, sexist etc, they were never as big issue's as what's been described upon by the screeching 4th wave feminists etc. No doubt things could be better but they were not as bad as claimed or it's been misrepresented because your side does in fact have an agenda.
Gamer Gate 2 etc...
Gamer Gate 2 etc...
The correct definition is a society, whether systematic and/or cultural, that excludes women from postions of power or inheritance.
Completely moronic yet consistent of you to believe a someone's own personal interpretation of a word(that leads to infinite versions) holds weight over an official definition used by the majority for most of its existence. You don't dictate language.
The very fact that there's nothing stopping women from holding positions of power, and in fact has the law cater to them, proves that there's no western patriarchy by definition. The fact that it was so non existent that they had to make up the wage gap is very telling.
Completely moronic yet consistent of you to believe a someone's own personal interpretation of a word(that leads to infinite versions) holds weight over an official definition used by the majority for most of its existence. You don't dictate language.
The very fact that there's nothing stopping women from holding positions of power, and in fact has the law cater to them, proves that there's no western patriarchy by definition. The fact that it was so non existent that they had to make up the wage gap is very telling.
You know that you have the same rethoric as a flat earther, right ?
Go tell that to researchers who are finding a LOT of issue still.
Capitalism saving lives ? Dude, your country's cities are full of what you guys call "favelas", don't tell me that capitalism is saving lives.
Indeed, noone dictates language. Only one thing does and its called: "USAGE" . That's why someone searching for dictionnary definition is simply delulu.
What you can do however is look for contextual and historical context of this usage to understand how definition are evolving through time and space.
Linguistic is very important and those who claim that there is a right and a wrong definition for words are usually not understanding it.
Dude.. come on. Educate yourself:
- [SCIENTIFIC RESSOURCE] - What is Patriarchy - The main scientific definitions
- [STUDY] - Theorizing Patriarchy
- [STUDY] - Women researchers are cited less than men
- [SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Women researchers are cited less than men and what can be done about it
- [DATA REPORT] - USA : Women are more likely to be paid less
- [STUDY] - Russia : Why women are less likely to access structures of power
- [STUDY] - Women's perception and expectations of having less power in leadership decreases their desire to seek leadership
Go tell that to researchers who are finding a LOT of issue still.
Capitalism saving lives ? Dude, your country's cities are full of what you guys call "favelas", don't tell me that capitalism is saving lives.
Indeed, noone dictates language. Only one thing does and its called: "USAGE" . That's why someone searching for dictionnary definition is simply delulu.
What you can do however is look for contextual and historical context of this usage to understand how definition are evolving through time and space.
Linguistic is very important and those who claim that there is a right and a wrong definition for words are usually not understanding it.
Dude.. come on. Educate yourself:
- [SCIENTIFIC RESSOURCE] - What is Patriarchy - The main scientific definitions
- [STUDY] - Theorizing Patriarchy
- [STUDY] - Women researchers are cited less than men
- [SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Women researchers are cited less than men and what can be done about it
- [DATA REPORT] - USA : Women are more likely to be paid less
- [STUDY] - Russia : Why women are less likely to access structures of power
- [STUDY] - Women's perception and expectations of having less power in leadership decreases their desire to seek leadership
The soviet union failed because of the opportunism of authoritarian, same for others mate. You are confusing socialism with authoritarism which is simply ignorant to say the least.
The fact that there was a bad one 80 or 200 year before doesn't change the fact that those events are happening more and more mate. But keep denying the scientific facts..
The fact that there was a bad one 80 or 200 year before doesn't change the fact that those events are happening more and more mate. But keep denying the scientific facts..
