Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
He did the same with demenus yesterday
Post automatically merged:
They can have different creation stories and still have similar teachings. Not every religion treats creation myths as dogmas of faith. Just look at Asian religions. Another L
Big L indeed
Post automatically merged:
they still cant be true at the same time, despite having values that are similar.
Big L indeed
Post automatically merged:
ah ok, i missed the sarcasm. yeah, its his secular mind at play here.
thats somewhat true, some religions are officially recognized as such by some governments. in germany for example, scientology isnt recognized as a religion.
and since religions, as i stated earlier, are extremely diverse, there really isnt a universal understanding of what consitutes a religion, prime example being buddhism that many people dont consider as a religion because buddha and his teachings arent directly tied to any actual deity.
doing the opposite though
you mean like mythologies like from ancient greece or egypt?
and since religions, as i stated earlier, are extremely diverse, there really isnt a universal understanding of what consitutes a religion, prime example being buddhism that many people dont consider as a religion because buddha and his teachings arent directly tied to any actual deity.
Post automatically merged:
doing the opposite though
Post automatically merged:
Post automatically merged:
you mean like mythologies like from ancient greece or egypt?
Objetive morality= Evil and Good are factual.
Subjetive morality= Evil and Good are creations.
As i see it, the subjective morality is definitely wrong, because even if people do have different interpretations and eventual disagreements on minor topics,most people agree on core principles such: don't steal,don't kill and so on. Which is a historical fact. Most religions boil down to love your neighbor and worship God. There are minor differences, but at the core they are pretty similar on their morality.
Subjetive morality= Evil and Good are creations.
As i see it, the subjective morality is definitely wrong, because even if people do have different interpretations and eventual disagreements on minor topics,most people agree on core principles such: don't steal,don't kill and so on. Which is a historical fact. Most religions boil down to love your neighbor and worship God. There are minor differences, but at the core they are pretty similar on their morality.
Talking about the exodus stuff. Causing a women to miscarry because of a fight is bad in any timeline, the way people will aproach this problem and apply punishments changes according to time. The principles are always the same, but approach might change. Did i make myself clear now?
Yep, but even the atheist ones says there is a spiritual world, life after death, consequences in the after life and so on. So they still believe in something beyond this life.
You did generalize too much on that post. Yes, concept of religion isn't cut and clear either. Governments don't have a final saying in what people believe or not. The Soviet Union tried to outlaw Christianity/Religion and it still survived.
Post automatically merged:
Yep, but even the atheist ones says there is a spiritual world, life after death, consequences in the after life and so on. So they still believe in something beyond this life.
Post automatically merged:
thats somewhat true, some religions are officially recognized as such by some governments. in germany for example, scientology isnt recognized as a religion.
and since religions, as i stated earlier, are extremely diverse, there really isnt a universal understanding of what consitutes a religion, prime example being buddhism that many people dont consider as a religion because buddha and his teachings arent directly tied to any actual deity.
doing the opposite though
you mean like mythologies like from ancient greece or egypt?
and since religions, as i stated earlier, are extremely diverse, there really isnt a universal understanding of what consitutes a religion, prime example being buddhism that many people dont consider as a religion because buddha and his teachings arent directly tied to any actual deity.
Post automatically merged:
doing the opposite though
Post automatically merged:
Post automatically merged:
you mean like mythologies like from ancient greece or egypt?
Last edited:
Me too.
Accepting LGBTQI+ people in society is a moral act. So tell me, where is the link with religion when all religious texts are against the acceptation of those people ?
Yeah, my fellow leftists in the 70' to 90' kinda rocked on that one. Praise to them \o/
Actually, Science was liberated from people like you. Don't try to speak about science when you don't understand 10 % of it.
Nah. I think you are confusing the word "scientist" with "complotist" or "jordan Peterson" maybe.
Debatable.
Then why do you need to add religion to an already pre existing conclusion ? Ockam's razor, mate. There is no need of religion to explain the present of morality in our societies, the environmental and social pressures are enough.
Debatable.
Burial rites are not necessarily the proof of religious beliefs mate.
(you didn't react to what I shared with you)
Nah, I'm saying that you should be careful of what you are saying. because if we look at the pattern here, far rightist are being banned one by one because they couldn't contain their bigoted visions.. so...
The more you talk, the less I understand you bro
And society came before religion
Lol no
There is no such thing
Accepting LGBTQI+ people in society is a moral act. So tell me, where is the link with religion when all religious texts are against the acceptation of those people ?
Yeah, my fellow leftists in the 70' to 90' kinda rocked on that one. Praise to them \o/
Actually, Science was liberated from people like you. Don't try to speak about science when you don't understand 10 % of it.
Nah. I think you are confusing the word "scientist" with "complotist" or "jordan Peterson" maybe.
Debatable.
Then why do you need to add religion to an already pre existing conclusion ? Ockam's razor, mate. There is no need of religion to explain the present of morality in our societies, the environmental and social pressures are enough.
Debatable.
Burial rites are not necessarily the proof of religious beliefs mate.
(you didn't react to what I shared with you)
Nah, I'm saying that you should be careful of what you are saying. because if we look at the pattern here, far rightist are being banned one by one because they couldn't contain their bigoted visions.. so...
The more you talk, the less I understand you bro
And society came before religion
Lol no
There is no such thing
Me too.
Accepting LGBTQI+ people in society is a moral act. So tell me, where is the link with religion when all religious texts are against the acceptation of those people ?
Yeah, my fellow leftists in the 70' to 90' kinda rocked on that one. Praise to them \o/
Actually, Science was liberated from people like you. Don't try to speak about science when you don't understand 10 % of it.
Nah. I think you are confusing the word "scientist" with "complotist" or "jordan Peterson" maybe.
Debatable.
Then why do you need to add religion to an already pre existing conclusion ? Ockam's razor, mate. There is no need of religion to explain the present of morality in our societies, the environmental and social pressures are enough.
Debatable.
Burial rites are not necessarily the proof of religious beliefs mate.
(you didn't react to what I shared with you)
Nah, I'm saying that you should be careful of what you are saying. because if we look at the pattern here, far rightist are being banned one by one because they couldn't contain their bigoted visions.. so...
The more you talk, the less I understand you bro
And society came before religion
Lol no
There is no such thing
Accepting LGBTQI+ people in society is a moral act. So tell me, where is the link with religion when all religious texts are against the acceptation of those people ?
Yeah, my fellow leftists in the 70' to 90' kinda rocked on that one. Praise to them \o/
Actually, Science was liberated from people like you. Don't try to speak about science when you don't understand 10 % of it.
Nah. I think you are confusing the word "scientist" with "complotist" or "jordan Peterson" maybe.
Debatable.
Then why do you need to add religion to an already pre existing conclusion ? Ockam's razor, mate. There is no need of religion to explain the present of morality in our societies, the environmental and social pressures are enough.
Debatable.
Burial rites are not necessarily the proof of religious beliefs mate.
(you didn't react to what I shared with you)
Nah, I'm saying that you should be careful of what you are saying. because if we look at the pattern here, far rightist are being banned one by one because they couldn't contain their bigoted visions.. so...
The more you talk, the less I understand you bro
And society came before religion
Lol no
There is no such thing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_themes_in_mythology
Post automatically merged:
That post is your only semi win in like 24 hours.
The goal in buddhism is to escape life,escape the cycle of rebirth (and its various realms of existence) by reaching the state of nirvana.
Rebirth cycle isnt really comparable to an afterlife in the sense of hell or heaven
Still did the opposite of generalizing, and the rest isnt really relevant to what was said
Just means them queer people are evil immoral motherfuckers my guy
Rebirth cycle isnt really comparable to an afterlife in the sense of hell or heaven
Post automatically merged:
Still did the opposite of generalizing, and the rest isnt really relevant to what was said
Post automatically merged:
Just means them queer people are evil immoral motherfuckers my guy