Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
No, he doesn't. Dude ain't honest either. He has a fanatical belief in his political views and he is dead set on forcing that nonsense on other people. The man is clearly lonely and trying to get people to interact with him that way online. I don't take him seriously. But i'm curious about what his reactions might be the day he gets cornered.
David Reimer.
Post automatically merged:
David Reimer.
Why is that dear mate ?
It took me half an hour... and I read all the needed part (abstracts, articles and conclusions)
With the help of other people who actually did the work of debunking those missinterpretation... I literally demonstrated how all your sources are either missinterpreting the actual studies and facts or actually going in my favor.
Accept the L mate. this won't be the last.
There is nuance among the left.
There is nuance among the right.
But the one who tries to tell you that there is a central path between the left and the right is lying to you.
- Either you are a materialist major or a idealist major (in the sence, in majority)
- Either you are for or against capitalism
Those things can't be nuanced. There is no central path. There is no compromises between the notions of those two sets of concepts.
Nop
Oh... The French influence strikes again.
In france, someone that is "documented" is someone that is "informed" or "knowledgable".
So the right word here is not "undocumented" but "uninformed"
My bad
More than him it seems
I think you are confusing "gender affirming care" and "gender affirming surgeries"
When have I ever been dishonnest about my point of view ?
I can only get corned with knowledge and it happens sometimes on this forum.
And guess what !
When it happens, I listen, I learn and I accept that my reasonning is wrong. You know why ?
Because I come from a complotist and far right background similar to yours. In fact in some ways a bit more problematic. And between the moment I became this and today, I learned, I questionned myself everyday and I listened, A LOT.
Today, being wrong is like finding the Saint Graal for me. I LOVE IT.
So come at me mate, prove to me that I'm wrong. I dare you. You will only make the conversation better ! But don't waste your time ! If you can't even understand that the sources that you share are missinterpreting scientific studies, you will have a hard time with me.
It took me half an hour... and I read all the needed part (abstracts, articles and conclusions)
With the help of other people who actually did the work of debunking those missinterpretation... I literally demonstrated how all your sources are either missinterpreting the actual studies and facts or actually going in my favor.
Accept the L mate. this won't be the last.
There is nuance among the left.
There is nuance among the right.
But the one who tries to tell you that there is a central path between the left and the right is lying to you.
- Either you are a materialist major or a idealist major (in the sence, in majority)
- Either you are for or against capitalism
Those things can't be nuanced. There is no central path. There is no compromises between the notions of those two sets of concepts.
Nop
Oh... The French influence strikes again.
In france, someone that is "documented" is someone that is "informed" or "knowledgable".
So the right word here is not "undocumented" but "uninformed"
My bad
More than him it seems
I think you are confusing "gender affirming care" and "gender affirming surgeries"
When have I ever been dishonnest about my point of view ?
I can only get corned with knowledge and it happens sometimes on this forum.
And guess what !
When it happens, I listen, I learn and I accept that my reasonning is wrong. You know why ?
Because I come from a complotist and far right background similar to yours. In fact in some ways a bit more problematic. And between the moment I became this and today, I learned, I questionned myself everyday and I listened, A LOT.
Today, being wrong is like finding the Saint Graal for me. I LOVE IT.
So come at me mate, prove to me that I'm wrong. I dare you. You will only make the conversation better ! But don't waste your time ! If you can't even understand that the sources that you share are missinterpreting scientific studies, you will have a hard time with me.
Dude, you say one thing at the beginning and another one afterwards lol
For stating a fact?
So what are you gonna do? You either attract your fans or your view count barely reaches hundreds of views despite uploading lots of videos.
The bold one is fucking irony considering you constantly run away from the reality and other challenges and blame your entire misfortune on the "SYSTEM".
Buddy, what are you gonna do?
Like, you cannot prevent people from getting successful while you're living in poverty. What I agree with is the fact that the government should make the living environments for less successful people more humane and bearable, so that they don't have to work near death for a miserable minimal wage. Again, it also depends on the country. Some countries do it better than the other ones.
Like, you could have just asked me such stuff instead of labelling me on a certain politic spectrum and I would agree on a heartbeat instead of rambling on about the guy receiving 6 figures, who would most likely have fun with your girl if you're allowing her to get physical with other dudes, lmao.
You just come up with lots of excuses, wall of texts and you're constantly demanding, demanding and demanding.
Is this your rational way of thinking? Highly increasing taxes of more successful people? Do you think it solves the issues?
At least you're admitting how it's difficult teaching you things.
You know what infuriates me?
You have no job, you pay no taxes, as of now, you don't contribute anything to society, isn't it? It isn't technically wrong since you're dealing with your own mental health issues or whatever prevents you from socialising, yet you're demanding such a ridiculous BS about people nearly paying 90% of their income when they're wealthier than you. Imagine the audacity.
Well, I have to admit that I'm not that politically involved over the last 3 - 4 years and the terms of centrists might have changed from back then. At least in Germany, when people said they were centrists, it was always about the context, that they partially follow both aspects of right and left, depending on the topics.
In my case, I agree with everything which are either scientific true or are morally acceptable.
For stating a fact?
So what are you gonna do? You either attract your fans or your view count barely reaches hundreds of views despite uploading lots of videos.
The bold one is fucking irony considering you constantly run away from the reality and other challenges and blame your entire misfortune on the "SYSTEM".
Buddy, what are you gonna do?
Like, you cannot prevent people from getting successful while you're living in poverty. What I agree with is the fact that the government should make the living environments for less successful people more humane and bearable, so that they don't have to work near death for a miserable minimal wage. Again, it also depends on the country. Some countries do it better than the other ones.
Like, you could have just asked me such stuff instead of labelling me on a certain politic spectrum and I would agree on a heartbeat instead of rambling on about the guy receiving 6 figures, who would most likely have fun with your girl if you're allowing her to get physical with other dudes, lmao.
You just come up with lots of excuses, wall of texts and you're constantly demanding, demanding and demanding.
Is this your rational way of thinking? Highly increasing taxes of more successful people? Do you think it solves the issues?
At least you're admitting how it's difficult teaching you things.
You know what infuriates me?
You have no job, you pay no taxes, as of now, you don't contribute anything to society, isn't it? It isn't technically wrong since you're dealing with your own mental health issues or whatever prevents you from socialising, yet you're demanding such a ridiculous BS about people nearly paying 90% of their income when they're wealthier than you. Imagine the audacity.
Post automatically merged:
Well, I have to admit that I'm not that politically involved over the last 3 - 4 years and the terms of centrists might have changed from back then. At least in Germany, when people said they were centrists, it was always about the context, that they partially follow both aspects of right and left, depending on the topics.
In my case, I agree with everything which are either scientific true or are morally acceptable.
Last edited:
Associated:"related/connected/linked/correlated/analogous/similar/alike". Those erratas meant shit, they were all saying the same thing.The studies were not invalidated. The errata was about making it clear that it was about post-procedure patients. Learn to fucking read.
Its a fact that trans people are a group that is prone to suicide and those studies clearly indicate that undergoing the knife actually increases the likelihood of suicide(google what associated means,moron). You literally discarded one of them just cause its associated(oh the irony) with a religious institution, that is not how science works.
That is called ad hominem, you need to attack the arguments and not individuals or institutions crafting those.
You asked for the science behind my statement, i presented the articles to you. You are cherry picking shit cause you don't like the facts. You are full of shit.
The errata just clarified that the study is about patients post-procedure. You have reading comprehension problems, son.
You discarded one study because it was published by a religious institution(ad hominem). You were cherry picking about the errata. Your arguments are bullshit. The links i posted clearly show that trans people are prone to suicide and that gender affirming surgery makes it worse. About 12X worse. Meaning of associated, smart ass:
Associated: related/connected/linked/correlated/analogous/similar/alike/kindred/corresponding/attendant/accompanying/auxiliary/accessory/incidental/cognate.
Its a fact that trans people are a group that is prone to suicide and those studies clearly indicate that undergoing the knife actually increases the likelihood of suicide(google what associated means,moron). You literally discarded one of them just cause its associated(oh the irony) with a religious institution, that is not how science works.
That is called ad hominem, you need to attack the arguments and not individuals or institutions crafting those.
You asked for the science behind my statement, i presented the articles to you. You are cherry picking shit cause you don't like the facts. You are full of shit.
- Original abstract conclusions: "Gender-affirming surgery is significantly associated with elevated suicide attempt risks, underlining the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support."
Corrected to: "Patients who have undergone gender-affirming surgery are associated with a significantly elevated risk of suicide, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support."
- Original first sentence of the Conclusions section: "The results of this study show that gender-affirmation surgery is associated with a significantly higher risk of suicide, death, suicide/self-harm, and PTSD compared to control groups in this real-world database."
Corrected to: "The results of this study indicate that patients who have undergone gender affirmation surgery are associated with significantly higher risks of suicide, self-harm, and PTSD compared to general population control groups in this real-world database."
The errata just clarified that the study is about patients post-procedure. You have reading comprehension problems, son.
Why is that dear mate ?
It took me half an hour... and I read all the needed part (abstracts, articles and conclusions)
With the help of other people who actually did the work of debunking those missinterpretation... I literally demonstrated how all your sources are either missinterpreting the actual studies and facts or actually going in my favor.
Accept the L mate. this won't be the last.
There is nuance among the left.
There is nuance among the right.
But the one who tries to tell you that there is a central path between the left and the right is lying to you.
- Either you are a materialist major or a idealist major (in the sence, in majority)
- Either you are for or against capitalism
Those things can't be nuanced. There is no central path. There is no compromises between the notions of those two sets of concepts.
Nop
Oh... The French influence strikes again.
In france, someone that is "documented" is someone that is "informed" or "knowledgable".
So the right word here is not "undocumented" but "uninformed"
My bad
More than him it seems
I think you are confusing "gender affirming care" and "gender affirming surgeries"
When have I ever been dishonnest about my point of view ?
I can only get corned with knowledge and it happens sometimes on this forum.
And guess what !
When it happens, I listen, I learn and I accept that my reasonning is wrong. You know why ?
Because I come from a complotist and far right background similar to yours. In fact in some ways a bit more problematic. And between the moment I became this and today, I learned, I questionned myself everyday and I listened, A LOT.
Today, being wrong is like finding the Saint Graal for me. I LOVE IT.
So come at me mate, prove to me that I'm wrong. I dare you. You will only make the conversation better ! But don't waste your time ! If you can't even understand that the sources that you share are missinterpreting scientific studies, you will have a hard time with me.
It took me half an hour... and I read all the needed part (abstracts, articles and conclusions)
With the help of other people who actually did the work of debunking those missinterpretation... I literally demonstrated how all your sources are either missinterpreting the actual studies and facts or actually going in my favor.
Accept the L mate. this won't be the last.
There is nuance among the left.
There is nuance among the right.
But the one who tries to tell you that there is a central path between the left and the right is lying to you.
- Either you are a materialist major or a idealist major (in the sence, in majority)
- Either you are for or against capitalism
Those things can't be nuanced. There is no central path. There is no compromises between the notions of those two sets of concepts.
Nop
Oh... The French influence strikes again.
In france, someone that is "documented" is someone that is "informed" or "knowledgable".
So the right word here is not "undocumented" but "uninformed"
My bad
More than him it seems
I think you are confusing "gender affirming care" and "gender affirming surgeries"
When have I ever been dishonnest about my point of view ?
I can only get corned with knowledge and it happens sometimes on this forum.
And guess what !
When it happens, I listen, I learn and I accept that my reasonning is wrong. You know why ?
Because I come from a complotist and far right background similar to yours. In fact in some ways a bit more problematic. And between the moment I became this and today, I learned, I questionned myself everyday and I listened, A LOT.
Today, being wrong is like finding the Saint Graal for me. I LOVE IT.
So come at me mate, prove to me that I'm wrong. I dare you. You will only make the conversation better ! But don't waste your time ! If you can't even understand that the sources that you share are missinterpreting scientific studies, you will have a hard time with me.
Associated: related/connected/linked/correlated/analogous/similar/alike/kindred/corresponding/attendant/accompanying/auxiliary/accessory/incidental/cognate.
Last edited:
Yep, its a silent epidemic of destroyed lives. Cunts and idiots are cheering it. Dark times.
That is communism. They are all thieves.
Post automatically merged:
Bro, it's true. Imagine you finally managed to rise as a department manager and some jobless bum tries to demand from you that you have to nearly pay 90% of your income. What kinda distorted world lives Logiko?
That's not what happened.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politic...es-donating-45m-month-super-pac-backing-trump
Even before Elon, announced it Trump himself said he heard about it, but Elon hadn't mentioned it to him.
He has his own PAC that will be donating to those who supports his values.
Truth has value.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politic...es-donating-45m-month-super-pac-backing-trump
Even before Elon, announced it Trump himself said he heard about it, but Elon hadn't mentioned it to him.
He has his own PAC that will be donating to those who supports his values.
Truth has value.