Two hands = stronger swordsman
That’s not true, Zoro has like two “two-handed” attacks and they aren’t his strongest attacks by a mile
Being a stronger swordsman simply means being the swordsman who wins the fight
Zoro is more skilled at swordsmanship than king or queen but if they can beat him just using their swordsmanship they’d be the stronger ones
Tho when it’s comes to characters that don’t even consider themselves swordsman idk if they’d really be challenged.
Like
- Daz while basically a sword man doesn’t consider himself one. Tho take away s-hawks sword he’d most likely still consider himself a swordsman
- Kaku while the best swordsman in cp9 doesn’t use his physical swords post timeskip. So idk if he still counts as a swordsman just by using his legs like the rest of cipher pol
- Pica uses a sword but diamanté was an actual swordsman
i asked a question “why does winning a “sword duel” make you a “better swordsman””
do you understand what I’m asking? I used the example above of the character who wins the fight by being 10 times stronger than another character but you seem to have not have had an answer to that
Okay let’s get more specific, you say Zoro is “more skilled” than King, when? You mean before Zoro got AdvcoC?
so let’s use this scenario. Zoro never gets AdvCoC. Zoro fights King in a “sword duel” and King never removes his lunarian fire. Zoro loses a Sword duel against King because Zoro physically cannot damage king.
Is this Zoro “more skilled” than King yet he lost their “Sword duel”