Being a swordswoman is irrelevant in itself and not the decisive aspect, the relevant thing is if her swordsmanship is the peak of her might, if so, yes she is under Mihawk, if not, it´s stupid to assume so.
Guys around here are hypocritical, they blame people for putting swordsmanship on a pedestal with "true swordsman and all" (which i agree with is nonsense, there is a code that some swordsman who respect each other live by, but it was never stated as requisite for being considered a swordsman, but simply one that you can respect and fight on equal terms).
At the same time they put swordsmanship on a pedestal themselves, like it describes everything about a fighter, and once you are considered one, everything else becomes irrelevant and you are only judged based on that.
Swordsmanship is a fighting style that uses a sword, nothing else needs to be said about it, and the peak of that fighting style is Mihawk. And a swordsman is someone who can use or is using swordsmanship, also very clear.
But if you use swordsmanship but have stronger fighting styles, are you limited by your ability in your swordsmanship? Everyone with half a brain would answer no.
Whitebeard could match Roger with his bisento and his uber haki, even assuming Bisento is not a sword, that would make him a spearman, right? Using a sword makes you a swordsman, so using a spear makes you a spearman consequently (you can call it spear holder, sounds better). Is Whitebeard limited by his spear mastery? He was able to match Roger, and made Blackbeard his bitch while being half dead, how could he not considered to be one. Yet the strongest part of Whitebeard is his fruit, the most destructive fruit in the world, to claim he would be limited by only the bisento is nonsense.
Anyone would agree to this, but suddenly with swords it is a different story since swords are holy and need to have different rules, this is the hypocritical part.
There are many mixed martial artists (which boxing is a part of obviously) who also fought in boxing only matches and are listed in the federations, a lot of them can compete in boxing even on a high level but have not reached or won titles but do hold titles in the UFC and other MMA organizations, because their skill in boxing, while great, is trumped by their skill and strength in grappling and their ground game for example.
Can these people not be considered boxers anymore? The boxing world disagrees.
Are they limited by their boxing? Obviously not.
And while they might lose against the respective boxing champions of the many federations and classes, using their strongest fighting style might change things, does not have to obviously, but can.
That´s really all that needs to be said about it.
Guys around here are hypocritical, they blame people for putting swordsmanship on a pedestal with "true swordsman and all" (which i agree with is nonsense, there is a code that some swordsman who respect each other live by, but it was never stated as requisite for being considered a swordsman, but simply one that you can respect and fight on equal terms).
At the same time they put swordsmanship on a pedestal themselves, like it describes everything about a fighter, and once you are considered one, everything else becomes irrelevant and you are only judged based on that.
Swordsmanship is a fighting style that uses a sword, nothing else needs to be said about it, and the peak of that fighting style is Mihawk. And a swordsman is someone who can use or is using swordsmanship, also very clear.
But if you use swordsmanship but have stronger fighting styles, are you limited by your ability in your swordsmanship? Everyone with half a brain would answer no.
Whitebeard could match Roger with his bisento and his uber haki, even assuming Bisento is not a sword, that would make him a spearman, right? Using a sword makes you a swordsman, so using a spear makes you a spearman consequently (you can call it spear holder, sounds better). Is Whitebeard limited by his spear mastery? He was able to match Roger, and made Blackbeard his bitch while being half dead, how could he not considered to be one. Yet the strongest part of Whitebeard is his fruit, the most destructive fruit in the world, to claim he would be limited by only the bisento is nonsense.
Anyone would agree to this, but suddenly with swords it is a different story since swords are holy and need to have different rules, this is the hypocritical part.
There are many mixed martial artists (which boxing is a part of obviously) who also fought in boxing only matches and are listed in the federations, a lot of them can compete in boxing even on a high level but have not reached or won titles but do hold titles in the UFC and other MMA organizations, because their skill in boxing, while great, is trumped by their skill and strength in grappling and their ground game for example.
Can these people not be considered boxers anymore? The boxing world disagrees.
Are they limited by their boxing? Obviously not.
And while they might lose against the respective boxing champions of the many federations and classes, using their strongest fighting style might change things, does not have to obviously, but can.
That´s really all that needs to be said about it.
