Its really barefaced to claim shit like this when the whole agenda of it being fake is based on a few Tweets of someone (Sandman), who rowed back in other Tweets where he said it isnt fake...
So again: Based on WHAT are you claiming this? If its just what I know, and I didnt miss any info in this Thread, yall are pathetic.
So again: Based on WHAT are you claiming this? If its just what I know, and I didnt miss any info in this Thread, yall are pathetic.
You even know what Burden of Proof is? The ones who must prove it is legit are you and the other clowns, and there is no evidence, the font letter and size is different from other pages of the magazine, it is not from Sound & Magazine's profile to post something like this and there's no credibility to the OP of the scan, do you want else?
Also, Sandman never said it wasn't fake. You didn't even read the tweets lol. What he said was that the translation was accurate but he never said nothing about the source and said to take the information with a grain of salt. Only later it was informed that this was supposed to be on Sound & Recording magazine, which Sandman denied.
What's pathetic here is you being the last one to not accept it's fake. What's the problem? Is there something so important about this scan?
If this thread exposed something, was your hipocrisy and heavy bias (although you were never known for your honesty and impartiality)
Last edited: