You may disagree with some of them but it should be noted that you don't even seem to oppose it that strongly, if I can put it that way.
Most people in America, regardless of religion, aren’t heavily invested in Israel/Palestine.
Hell, only 65% of the voting population even voted last election.
[automerge]1748190894[/automerge]
On another topic. I don’t think AI will replace artists in the long run. It will just change the nature of art jobs.
AI does hurt a certain type of artist. Guys on the internet that you can commission to draw your OCs or whatever. That is something people can and will just use AI for. An image generator basically does that exact same job.
Tbh I think this is fine. Every time new tech comes out, some people’s jobs become obsolete.
But the thing is, AI cannot do everything. AI cannot think. If you want art to convey a specific meaning or serve a particular function, that is something a human needs to do. Also AI cannot think make mistakes, meaning you would need an actual artist to at least review the art to possibly do corrections.
Basically, artists aren’t obsolete, it’s just that the nature of art is different. Yes if you do the exact same thing an AI can do, nobody is going to pay you anymore. But if you engage in art on more of a high level, you can still stay relevant.
Ex. There are countless books out there that either don’t have good adaptations or don’t have adaptations at all into a visual format. Making an adaptation is still something you need a real artist for, as it requires actual human thinking.
Hopefully now with AI, it will be easier to make good content.