Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Gender*, gay and lesbian can date people with different sexual characteristics. In this case it's a little bit different, as it is not something that we can really control.
Actually this can be an interesting question. While I don't consider this as an oppressed condition reallyish, the stigma against bald people is definitely the echo of the intersection of different systems of domination: Without too much thinking I would say ableism and patriarchy. Ableism because baldness is associated with handicaps and illness and patriarchy because baldness makes us "less of a man".
Fair
Not all dating preferences are bad.
Again, I can't give you a straight answer. It's like explaining what colors feels like. It's unexplanable. At best I can't explain what it's not, different parameter, perhaps in contrast with the fact of not being a woman, but what it feels like or what it is to be a man is up to every men. It's for you to answer this question for yourself. It doesn't have to be clustered.
No. The opposite. People have sexual characteristics, therefore they are imprinted with the gender of women. Most people will accept it and will live ok with this imprint, but others (trans people) not so much. The reasons has yet to be explained, but it doesn't really matter, what is important is that trans people exist, they are legitimate.
Actually this can be an interesting question. While I don't consider this as an oppressed condition reallyish, the stigma against bald people is definitely the echo of the intersection of different systems of domination: Without too much thinking I would say ableism and patriarchy. Ableism because baldness is associated with handicaps and illness and patriarchy because baldness makes us "less of a man".
Fair
Not all dating preferences are bad.
Again, I can't give you a straight answer. It's like explaining what colors feels like. It's unexplanable. At best I can't explain what it's not, different parameter, perhaps in contrast with the fact of not being a woman, but what it feels like or what it is to be a man is up to every men. It's for you to answer this question for yourself. It doesn't have to be clustered.
No. The opposite. People have sexual characteristics, therefore they are imprinted with the gender of women. Most people will accept it and will live ok with this imprint, but others (trans people) not so much. The reasons has yet to be explained, but it doesn't really matter, what is important is that trans people exist, they are legitimate.
Colour is the appearance that things have that results from the way in which they reflect light
Also, a colour perception by humans is defined by its wavelength.
Simple like that, two definitions. Maybe for poor scholarised manchildren it's unexplainable.
My friend, you said that women have female characteristics here:
And then you say the opposite. What is it lil' buddy, having word salad syndrome?
Also the fact that I have been punched by women, assaulted by men and mugged by men in the past means I should not be scared of being alone with a stranger with a knife? Are you insane?
[automerge]1760981495[/automerge]
He doesn't go out, how would he know.
Goalpost moving 101
Yeah, but not what they feel like or why I prefer a color over another or why I see color a certain way.. Gender is a social construct, that's what I can tell you, being a man is also a social construct. Now, what being a man means to you, I have no idea. It's up to you to find the answer.
I said "people" specifically for a reason, not women.
You don't have to project your experience on me, I was talking about me. If you are afraid with stranger, I'm sorry for you, but what do you want me to say?
Then I am the one twisting uh? You used "people" to define the women who have female sexual characteristics.
Literally.
Not projecting. You said that ONLY women have to be worried about that, which means me, a man, doesn't have to.
Do you have an understanding of what you say or you just randomly spout words?
Literally.
Not projecting. You said that ONLY women have to be worried about that, which means me, a man, doesn't have to.
Do you have an understanding of what you say or you just randomly spout words?
You are not afraid in contraposition with a woman, meaning that only a woman can be a victim of that.
Otherwise your entire phrase doesn't have sense. Because you are a MAN because you are not [..] afraid of what a man could to to you alone.
Dishonest as always.
Twisting your own words, little buddy? You didn't say CAN. You said they are oppressed because of female characteristics. No CAN. they NEED to to have female sexual characteristics. Otherwise how can they be oppressed because of that.
Thank you, finally something from you.
Otherwise your entire phrase doesn't have sense. Because you are a MAN because you are not [..] afraid of what a man could to to you alone.
Dishonest as always.
Twisting your own words, little buddy? You didn't say CAN. You said they are oppressed because of female characteristics. No CAN. they NEED to to have female sexual characteristics. Otherwise how can they be oppressed because of that.
Thank you, finally something from you.
And what would be the opposite ?
Therapy to force you to be gay ?
Nah, you just have an habit of twisting words to convince people that I say stuff I literally don't. (you can check, I verified). It was the same with Carrot. You took me challenging your ideas as a lack of coherency and as always, you can't take the heat when I prove that you are trying to twist my words to render my point incoherent and you finish with ableism as always. Simple insecurity really.
Therapy to force you to be gay ?
Nah, you just have an habit of twisting words to convince people that I say stuff I literally don't. (you can check, I verified). It was the same with Carrot. You took me challenging your ideas as a lack of coherency and as always, you can't take the heat when I prove that you are trying to twist my words to render my point incoherent and you finish with ableism as always. Simple insecurity really.
Won't join
And what would be the opposite ?
Therapy to force you to be gay ?
Nah, you just have an habit of twisting words to convince people that I say stuff I literally don't. (you can check, I verified). It was the same with Carrot. You took me challenging your ideas as a lack of coherency and as always, you can't take the heat when I prove that you are trying to twist my words to render my point incoherent and you finish with ableism as always. Simple insecurity really.
Therapy to force you to be gay ?
Nah, you just have an habit of twisting words to convince people that I say stuff I literally don't. (you can check, I verified). It was the same with Carrot. You took me challenging your ideas as a lack of coherency and as always, you can't take the heat when I prove that you are trying to twist my words to render my point incoherent and you finish with ableism as always. Simple insecurity really.
