Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1110 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter Absalom
- Start date
- Status
G
@Franosuke that bitch carrying my 4 years old quote about Pre-Marine Hunter boost 3 billion Mihawk (dumbass can't realize I never said Mihawk can't be 3 billion LMAO)
Ok these ZKKretards ask to get debunked again.
Nerfed DR Law (who got beat by Fujitora right before this) bruises Dof:
Chapter 730.
Only 4 chapters later, Dof completely heals his bruise in Chapter 735:
Ok these ZKKretards ask to get debunked again.
Nerfed DR Law (who got beat by Fujitora right before this) bruises Dof:
Chapter 730.
Only 4 chapters later, Dof completely heals his bruise in Chapter 735:
Which isn't much, tbh.
This was used to slander Zoro a long time ago, when Apoo did it too.
Actual Named Techniques are different and that's where Zoro's "attack power" actually lies.
This fight is quite literally Apoo 2.0. As i said, a Low Diff.
This was used to slander Zoro a long time ago, when Apoo did it too.
Actual Named Techniques are different and that's where Zoro's "attack power" actually lies.
This fight is quite literally Apoo 2.0. As i said, a Low Diff.
All he did was run and occasionally block a swing
Lucci was able to clash (at one point) with green smoke 3 sword Zoro and keep fighting without any signs of losing
Apoo wishes he could perform as well as Lucci did
Buddy, please don't tag me and don't change the subject. I think we were discussing the toxicity of fandoms. I'm not the least bit interested in your powerscalling discussions. I hope you will understand me. Thanks
You're looking at the the internal logic from within the story when you should be looking at the meta reason for the stalling. Luffy worrying about killing or hurting Bellamy doesn't make sense at all as Bellamy attempted to hurt Luffy even before he got parasited, and he knew that Law would need his assistance against Doffy. Also when has Luffy worried about his punches killing people? That was for the sake of stalling so Law and Doffy can get their character dynamic established, and to weaken Luffy.
Tashigi wasn't even present for the 1st half of Zoro vs Monet. Zoro was simply stalling with Monet, and in doing so he put his crew in serious risk, and Robin had to save Nami and Chopper. Does that sound like Zoro doing a good job protecting his nakama? No. It doesn't.
Against Kamazou, he was literally goofing around with him and Gyukimaru until he got stabbed, then finished the job soon after with a named attack ala Chapter 1110, and if you forgotten, he only fell because he had a poisoned stomach, hence the growl, not Kamazou's attack in and of itself. This was also so Zoro and Hiyori can have their dynamics established after the fight.
Zoro could of finished Pica off way sooner if he simply used one of his faster techniques, yet he didn't opt to use any techniques until Pica became a threat to everyone else on Dressrosa, and only then did he start using his named attacks. This stalling was so that Zoro can be busy, and can't aid Luffy and Law in their battle with Doffy. Same reason why the Birdcage exists.
You keep saying that Cracker and Lucci are the same, yet the context within the fight are so vastly different that they are far from comparable. Unlike Zoro in his Lucci fight, Luffy from the start needed G4, him best form at the time, and used named techniques in it, and still needed heavy carrying from Nami, and PIS from Cracker to get an illegitimate W.
Meanwhile Zoro hasn't used a single named attack, and although he did show Overflowing ACoA in his fight, it's pretty obvious that it was not needed as shown in Chapter 1110. You can't claim that Zoro and Lucci used any named attacks before the current chapter as there is no proof of such. Furthermore as I have showcased in the Zoro vs Monet fight, Zoro has the tendency to stall so shamelessly that his fight can spill over to his nakama and put them in serious danger. So just because Zoro says he serious about defeating his opponents and protecting his friends, that doesn't always come to fruition in terms of action. Regardless, stalling Lucci was in a weird way effective in protecting his crewmates from Lucci's wrath.
But really the meta reason for the stalling was so that the Bonney and Kuma could get their backstories told, Luffy can give Bonney hope in the Sun God once again, and so that Vegapunk can die. If Zoro was present, there be enough powerful bodies on the allies' side to make Vegapunk's death avoidable.
Tashigi wasn't even present for the 1st half of Zoro vs Monet. Zoro was simply stalling with Monet, and in doing so he put his crew in serious risk, and Robin had to save Nami and Chopper. Does that sound like Zoro doing a good job protecting his nakama? No. It doesn't.
Against Kamazou, he was literally goofing around with him and Gyukimaru until he got stabbed, then finished the job soon after with a named attack ala Chapter 1110, and if you forgotten, he only fell because he had a poisoned stomach, hence the growl, not Kamazou's attack in and of itself. This was also so Zoro and Hiyori can have their dynamics established after the fight.
Zoro could of finished Pica off way sooner if he simply used one of his faster techniques, yet he didn't opt to use any techniques until Pica became a threat to everyone else on Dressrosa, and only then did he start using his named attacks. This stalling was so that Zoro can be busy, and can't aid Luffy and Law in their battle with Doffy. Same reason why the Birdcage exists.
You keep saying that Cracker and Lucci are the same, yet the context within the fight are so vastly different that they are far from comparable. Unlike Zoro in his Lucci fight, Luffy from the start needed G4, him best form at the time, and used named techniques in it, and still needed heavy carrying from Nami, and PIS from Cracker to get an illegitimate W.
Meanwhile Zoro hasn't used a single named attack, and although he did show Overflowing ACoA in his fight, it's pretty obvious that it was not needed as shown in Chapter 1110. You can't claim that Zoro and Lucci used any named attacks before the current chapter as there is no proof of such. Furthermore as I have showcased in the Zoro vs Monet fight, Zoro has the tendency to stall so shamelessly that his fight can spill over to his nakama and put them in serious danger. So just because Zoro says he serious about defeating his opponents and protecting his friends, that doesn't always come to fruition in terms of action. Regardless, stalling Lucci was in a weird way effective in protecting his crewmates from Lucci's wrath.
But really the meta reason for the stalling was so that the Bonney and Kuma could get their backstories told, Luffy can give Bonney hope in the Sun God once again, and so that Vegapunk can die. If Zoro was present, there be enough powerful bodies on the allies' side to make Vegapunk's death avoidable.
@Ryuarashi where you at? 
@Franosuke that bitch carrying my 4 years old quote about Pre-Marine Hunter boost 3 billion Mihawk (dumbass can't realize I never said Mihawk can't be 3 billion LMAO)
Ok these ZKKretards ask to get debunked again.
Nerfed DR Law (who got beat by Fujitora right before this) bruises Dof:
Chapter 730.
Only 4 chapters later, Dof completely heals his bruise in Chapter 735:
Ok these ZKKretards ask to get debunked again.
Nerfed DR Law (who got beat by Fujitora right before this) bruises Dof:
Chapter 730.
Only 4 chapters later, Dof completely heals his bruise in Chapter 735:
No, both are announcing he will lose consciousness.
On Enies Loby he wasn't saying "I'll lose consciousness if I fall into the sea". He can avoid the sea easily with geppou unless he's not conscious. He was worrying about falling into the sea because he was losing consciousness.
Both are the same. Just in one scene he would fall to the ground and on the other he would fall to the sea and die. But he endured the first time, no proof he didn't endure the second time just because he had the same dialogue.
On Enies Loby he wasn't saying "I'll lose consciousness if I fall into the sea". He can avoid the sea easily with geppou unless he's not conscious. He was worrying about falling into the sea because he was losing consciousness.
Both are the same. Just in one scene he would fall to the ground and on the other he would fall to the sea and die. But he endured the first time, no proof he didn't endure the second time just because he had the same dialogue.
- Status