I'm not going to instruct you here.
Oh please. Condenscend me more, why don't you.
But if you're town, there are many more ways you could have gone about this rather than start with some absolutely shoddy accusation and then fall back on some info that you are no making clear, even if you are to be believed, is subject to interpretation.
The info really isn't important at this point.
Rather you pretended like you had the mother-of-all-checks on me when you've really got a shit hand.
I never once pretended I had you bang to rights. I didn't even ask for your claim. I made sure to check that being in a QT chat didn't affect it, too, first.
So before criticizing my responses to you, which nobody seems to think have been really all that bad, perhaps you should reflect on your approach here, where you tried to suffocate me with a wet paper bag.
Nobody seems to think they're that bad because they either haven't read it, or just refused to engage with it. Like, nobody, not one person, has tried to challenge my assertions, or point out where I've gone astray in my logic. What am I do here? Just talk to a wall? My approach was fine, can't help the audience.
Oh, and if I were to even extend an ounce of charity to you during your accusation earlier, I guarunfuckingtee you would have interpreted that as a sign of weakness and called that scummy as well. Your case is weak because every response of mine *must* be damning, but anyone can see they really aren't.
I never once said every response of yours was damning, I've taken care not to confirmation bias myself here. I'm frankly astounded how you're getting away with this, and I really can only assume it's spite. I expected you would at least start to concede certain points, but no, because you're completely getting away with it. And it's frustrating to me because if it were the other way around, I would be rightfully getting slammed for it. Might really be time to quarter-ass games again.