Speculations Shanks is not who we think he is.

Sort of an extension post from a comment i made in another thread but I feel it warrants a separate discussion. This is in NO WAY a statement outside of my own thoughts or belief, I just personally have been a huge skeptic of Shanks as this "perfect" pirate that Luffy should look up to. Before responding, please read the whole thing. There is no tldr, other than the fact that I'm not saying Shanks is evil, but rather a morally grey antagonist that may serve as an eventual foil for Luffy. There are things in the story that support this so im just going to list them out below. Up to you if you want to believe any of it or agree. Some of it is direct evidence from the manga, some of it is a little bit of theorizing from said evidence in the manga. That said, Blackbeard imo, is still an intrinsic part to the climax of the story, so don't feel too deterred from reading if that is the case. Anyway:


- Oda has known the ending to his series since before his series began. This is very unlike most other long running manga because usually the bigger they get, their endings have to fluctuate based on what can be done. We do know (as Oda reminds us always) that his ending hasn't changed. This is important because no matter how much bigger one piece gets, it seems that it will return to its roots primarily for this reason. There are 2 major things that have remained constant since the beginning of the series: Shanks and the Strawhat. They are the biggest things that come out of chapter 1. Blackbeard wasn't hinted at until the 130's and wasnt introduced until the 230's. While there is no evidence to say Oda hadn't conceived Blackbeard from the beginning, we can be sure Shanks was an idea already when Oda drafted his ending. The same goes for Akainu/Im, whom are characters even conceived even further into the story.

- Shanks himself is probably the most enigmatic character in the series. We know next to nothing about his motivations or primary feelings about pretty much anything. There are some things that seem to give away to his character though.


- Shanks has constant competitive, almost "dark" looking faces anytime Luffy is mentioned via bounty poster. This has been consistent virtually every time Luffy is mentioned. When he talks to Luffy at Marineford, its yet another weird looking face (the shading; how Oda drew it) that sort of doesn't fit the tone of the scene in a way.

- Shanks is an interesting harbinger of peace, but it's by which he achieves said "peace" that's odd: His relationship to the WG. Sengoku seems to respect him. This seemed normal until we got chapter 906, his discussion with the Gorosei. This does not make sense in context. The Gorosei murder and commit genocides in droves. This should be the biggest red flag for anyone thinking Shanks is a primarily "good" person.

- Then on that note, his conversation with them ends about a "certain pirate". I hope people know that Oda is all about misdirect when it comes to dialogue. We KNOW Shanks has a disdain for Blackbeard, we KNOW he's warned Whitebeard about him with Ace. So WHY is Oda not actually referencing this "certain pirate" by name prior as if to leave it a mystery?

- What's interesting is that the last thing Shanks did before going to the Gorosei is look at Luffy's 1.5 billion poster and say "it's about time we meet Luffy". Not saying it means anything but there was no major Blackbeard or any other pirate news prior to this so...take what you will from that.

- Shanks also the same age as the God Valley incident. Oden's flashback also seems to hint that Roger has had Shanks since he was a baby (and maybe even Buggy, who is also the same age). On top of this, Oden's flashback left us with a weird moment where Oden catches Shanks asking Roger an "unknown question", to which Roger responds and Shanks crying. This is a BIG TELL that there is more to Shanks' character than what we know, a hidden emotional connection to Roger or that question.

- God Valley itself is yet another enigmatic island like Laugh Tale. The WG erased the island from maps for a reason, which means Rocks was there for a reason they didn't want another pirate to repeat. If it was just killing the CD's, erasing the island doesn't make much sense when many of them seem to have relocated to Mariejois. On top of this, the term used is "erased from maps", not destroyed. I think this will play a huge role in the climax, not just Laugh Tale

- A BIG confirmation happened also during Oden's flashback that shows Shanks and Buggy never went to Laugh Tale. This really hurts the whole "gatekeepter" theory because it proves that Shanks wasn't any closer to One Piece than the other Yonko and wouldn't have known where Laugh Tale was.

- We also have zero idea if Shanks is interested or emotionally invested in "One Piece" specifically. His vested interest seems to partially come from Luffy and him meeting again, but why? What does he know or want Luffy to do? He talks about "betting his arm" on the new age, but Shanks never went to Laugh Tale so we have no idea what this actually suggests. There is an idea that "betting his arm" on Luffy suggests malicious intent due to him being a D., and also a reason why he didn't want Ace to die. They are/were candidates for "something". I won't get too deep into theory territory though, it's too early, although I have a summary at the end of my post from a reddit user who I think nailed what I am talking about.


- Shanks' crew quite literally rips Kids arm off in a battle with him. Killer also has some bad scars. Pretty violent for a "peaceful" man who sacrificed his own arm for something. Let it be known that Lucky Roo still shot a man in the head in chapter 1. These people are brutal and Yonko are no joke, not even Shanks.

- Luffy has proclaimed twice that he wants to beat Shanks physically, once at Punk Hazard ("as long as Shanks isn't first!"/"I plan on taking down all 4 Yonko") and once at Wano explaining to Hyougoro what the Yonko are.

- A big part of why I think Shanks may be the true final antagonist (not villain, there is a difference) is Mihawk. Mihawk lost his Shichibukai status and his only known association with another pirate is Shanks. Im not saying he will "join" the Red-Haired pirates as Shanks' subordinate but an alliance almost seems likely since what comes after Wano is the world being in turmoil. For Mihawk to be aimless until his eventual final fight with Zoro seems weird, and that the thing, he should be Zoro's final fight. IF Mihawk joins Shanks, then I pretty much expect Shanks to be Luffy's final fight then as well.

- Finally, Shanks being the final battle just works extremely well as an emotional ending to this manga. Returning the hat seems to be the "big loop" this series has gone for, as there are even possible indications Luffy becomes PK before the series ends (before the Final War). Luffy returning the hat to Shanks on the grounds that he wasn't this exactly who he though he was, is almost beautifully tragic to me (the implication being Shanks has ulterior motives that are morally grey). It works for Zoro vs. Mihawk because that should be Zoro's last fight (assuming Mihawk allies with Shanks for the final war). It works well for Usopp because surpassing his father (assuming they meet before on Elbaf or another location) is probably an extension of his brave warrior dream since everything he is based on his father leaving him. I just think there is a huge emotional connection to Shanks being the final antagonist here, not Blackbeard, who's crew members come off more as "epic" villains than serious ones in all their chaos.


Pretty much all I have. One other thing to note is Blackbeard and Shanks certainly dislike each other. When I suggest Shanks being an antagonist, he is also an antagonist to Blackbeard, not just Luffy, and vice versa. Even with their personalities you get very different vibes from them in terms of how they handle things. RED Haired Shanks. BLACKbeard. Order and Chaos. Freedom through controlled peace. Freedom through disarray and panic. Luffy stopping both for his own version of freedom, which we all know would be different. Shanks potentially misinterpreting Roger's will. Makes you wonder if it's always been that intentional for Oda.



‐----------------------

Additionally, I've seen some crazy, interesting facts/ideas about Shanks recently that make me actually more of a believer he has massive ties to the ending, and thats his whole "Yakuza" like influence. Credit goes to a reddit user dfd2002 who commented on a theory thread i made the other day, but essentially:


- Shanks epithet, "Akagami", can actually be read in multiple ways. (Red Hair)/ "赤髪" or (Dirty God)/"垢神". We KNOW how much Oda likes to play with words and puns. "Dirty God" could imply he is a leader of something "false" or "dirty", something like the Underworld? To elaborate, Oda introduced 6 new Underworld characters into WCI, why? None of them are truly important, but what if, like the Gorosei to Im, they all serve a secret leader?


- Even on that note, the Underworld is massively used by network of many kingdoms, the Yonko and even the World Government. Could this be how Shanks reached the Gorosei so easily? Also why they casually greet him like its no surprise?

- One big thing is that Shanks is referred to as "Kashira"/頭, not Captain/Taisho. Other translations have made it so (i believe Stephen has for simplicity), but Kashira is a term used to refer to a Yakuza boss. Whitebeard gets the less formal "Oyaji" or Pops, to very clearly there is a term of endearment/respect from Shanks' crew when it comes from this. Shanks is one of the few characters to have this reference outside of the actual Yakuza in Wano and I believe Luffy by the Strawhat fleet, which makes sense due to their sake ritual they Luffy hated. But Shanks has been referred to as this since Chapter 1, crazy as hell. Translations to English, I dont think it matters too much, but the fact this is how its done in Japanese and it is interesting Shanks is the only Yonko or major pirate to really have carried tha title since the beginning.

- Shanks is also from West blue (hes slightly older than the God Valley incident, about a year), where the 5 Yakuza families that Bege fucked over are from and also where the best Sake comes from. This could prove ties to the Underworld even more, but just an interesting fact, nothing big.

- Shank's bounty is, 4,048,900,000. The "489" part is so excruciatingly specific, that if you look up the number its normally relative to gambling and Yakuza. First off, 89 is the name for the japanese gambling card game "Oicho-Kabu" (kabfuda names for 8 and 9 respectively in the game), and is often referred to as the origin of the Yakuza name too. 89 also means "hand" in several other gambling games. 489 spelt together is "Shiyaku", and apparently can mean "playing the role of teacher/master", aka his relationship to Luffy, OR "playing the role of death", which is really weird, but would i be shocked lol


- But here's where it gets wild. Take Shanks' cryptic "I bet this arm on the new age" and turn it into something negative. Imagine he wasn't talking about Luffy saving the world as we all think (he wasn't even with Roger at Laugh Tale to find out the true history), but something much more cryptic. Shanks IS a gambler and betting man. Like the medieval-1800s Yakuza, losing a pinky is a means to resolve a bet if you do not have any other means to do so. It also means you generally lost your pinky on your dominant sword hand to prevent proper sword combat. Shanks predicament is almost exactly that. He lost his alleged dominant sword hand (not that it means much) and Mihawk refuses to fight him now. Could it be Shanks is betting on Luffy by influencing him? Why was he even in East Blue? Do we actually believe Shanks couldn't prevent his arm being lopped off if a stare at the Sea King worked just as well? What does Shanks actually want Luffy to do?

Seems insanely specific to me, and I didn't even reference everything this guy brought up. Look up Shimizu Jirocho. As of now Shanks doesn't really have an influential real life figure like many other characters do, at least outwardly. But this man, my god the sheer levels of influence is so up Oda's alley to do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimizu_Jirocho
- most famous yakuza in history
- adopted
- life has no recorded notable incidents between the death of his father and becoming a young adult
- became a gambler and criminal and started building a private navy (would be the Underworld)
- played the revolutionary army and the government against each other (wink wink, the sale of weapons and the increased conflicts have pitted both sides against each other more and more; look at Dressrosa)
- swordsman
- folk hero/robin hood figure in japan
- famously made sure people were buried properly after a war and defied the government in doing so (Ace/Whitebeard)
- was known to be able to settle major conflicts without casualties (Paramount War)


Everything under the dotted line above is credited to that reddit user, I just shortened (the list regarding Shimizu Jirocho is his) in my own words, but a lot of this almost seems way too coincidental to be just that, even when using the talking pointsI've mentioned above. All the above combined almost would make Shanks one of the deepest characters in this story, we just haven't found out his motivations yet.


Something is definitely going on with Shanks, and at this point I feel like its not exactly "good". Thoughts?

Edit: A 1.5 month late edit but im correcting my mistakes since it seems like this thread got bumped. It turns out u/dfd2002 is in fact our own @ArturCantSpeakJapanese , so pretty much the second half of this thread is credit to him, whoever is reading this now.
Okay I read it all because you recommended.

I actually like the theory pretty much, but I do not see it coherent that the actual red hair pirates remain undefeated until the end of the series to be final antagonists because they have much less narrative importance compared to the WG. Perhaps if it's only Shanks and Mihawk, but still...

A way I think this theory could work is if there's a trigger that causes Shanks to be much more evil and powerful. Like for example we have seen very weird things with Law's powers regarding Personality shifts and so on. Imu's body seems weak, perhap shanks could serve as a vessel? I don't know. It was a nice read anyway, I think I've seen this thread before
 
Okay I read it all because you recommended.

I actually like the theory pretty much, but I do not see it coherent that the actual red hair pirates remain undefeated until the end of the series to be final antagonists because they have much less narrative importance compared to the WG. Perhaps if it's only Shanks and Mihawk, but still...

A way I think this theory could work is if there's a trigger that causes Shanks to be much more evil and powerful. Like for example we have seen very weird things with Law's powers regarding Personality shifts and so on. Imu's body seems weak, perhap shanks could serve as a vessel? I don't know. It was a nice read anyway, I think I've seen this thread before
All I'll say is give it some time. Oda has been very keen on teasing Shanks as a character recently:

Jump Festa 2020
"Do you all want some exciting information regarding the story? That redhead guy may move...! The story is moving towards its final stage, so please enjoy next year as well!".

Jump Festa 2021
"The production is also progressing carefully. And we have Film RED! A new girl, Shanks, and Luffy!! Shanks is a character we haven't seen much of yet, so what's his relationship with that girl? Will he even meet Luffy?..."

When you combine this with some of the weird things he's been doing, it starts to "sort of" make sense. I will say that it's clear he has a hidden motivation, only because he's never discussed wanting One Piece or actually wanting Luffy to actually "save" the world like Whitebeard predicts he will once OP is found.

Again, could be totally wrong on this, but I think if Shanks was this perfect good guy, we would have known his goals and intent for Luffy already. And im not even trying to say he's "evil" per se, just more of a grey antagonist who people can still root for. This is kind of like Mihawk, who is "actually" a good person on an outward level, but IS Zoro's main antagonist (i.e. someone who inhibits the progression of a protagonist). Maybe that helps get my point across with Shanks. We gotta wait for now.
 
Last edited:
All I'll say is give it some time. Oda has been very keen on teasing Shanks as a character recently:

Jump Festa 2020
"Do you all want some exciting information regarding the story? That redhead guy may move...! The story is moving towards its final stage, so please enjoy next year as well!".

Jump Festa 2021
"The production is also progressing carefully. And we have Film RED! A new girl, Shanks, and Luffy!! Shanks is a character we haven't seen much of yet, so what's his relationship with that girl? Will he even meet Luffy?..."

When you combine this with some of the weird things he's been doing, it starts to "sort of" make sense. I will say that it's clear he has a hidden motivation, only because he's never discussed wanting One Piece or actually wanting Luffy to actually "save" the world like Whitebeard predicts he will once OP is found.

Again, could be totally wrong on this, but I think if Shanks was this perfect good guy, we would have knows his goals and intent for Luffy already. And im not even trying to say he's "evil" per se, just more of a grey antagonist who people can still root for. This is kind of like Mihawk, who is "actually" a good person on an outward level, but IS Zoro's main antagonist (i.e. someone who inhibits the progression of a protagonist). Maybe that helps get my point across with Shanks. We gotta wait for now.
Yh I agree that Shanks isnt good and that faceta of him is rather circumstancial. Is there any update about that movie?
 
Yh I agree that Shanks isnt good and that faceta of him is rather circumstancial. Is there any update about that movie?
Nothing much yet. There's a good/decent notion that we may learn a good deal more about Shanks before the movie premieres. That being said if he is an Antagonist, I don't expect the film to present him as one, but "maybe" hint as his antagonism if it exists. Reason being is regardless of where the manga gets, the anime viewers wouldn't see this for over a year.

For the record I don't expect Luffy and Shanks to meet on screen in the film. I think its mainly going to be about characters related to Shanks, but really not himself. Examples of this are just like how the other 3 films (Strong World, Z, Stampede) use Canon to set their plots, but aren't canon in the present.
 
Last edited:
Lord Shanks is the God of the Underworld.:finally::finally:
I'm not sure I agree. I dont think it cheapens Luffys character at all because I'm not saying Shanks is "evil", just a morally grey antagonist. Luffy being wrong about his mentor makes him his own person and in my opinion extremely poetic to how the story began. I personally dislike the "Jiraya's" or the "Dumbledore's" of fiction primarily because its an overused trope to have a mentor exist for the exact purpose of dying or improving the main characters resolve. Luffy already has had that with Ace, Shanks doesn't need to serve that anymore than what he does already.


And I'm still saying Shanks still wants peace, just not by orthodox or even ethical means. He didn't want Ace to die (to my knowledge assuming Kaido was going to make things worse). But my point is that it may all done for an ulterior motive. There is a reason he didn't want Ace to die, there seems to be a reason he wanted to influence Luffy and make him big.

For example, he must have known Luffy's full name when he met him. Considering he knew Roger extremely well, it seems off to me that he just happened to fatefully encounter Luffy at a young, impressionable age, almost as if he wanted to inspire Luffy to become a pirate. They were there for over a year, why?

You have a right to your opinion, definitely, but I seriously implore looking at all of these oddities Shanks has or connections Oda has laid out. For there to be "nothing" would actually be extremely weird at this point.

And I'm not saying he still can't still be a good character, but the stuff I'm saying above virtually proves there is way more to his character than we know, and THAT is what is important, because a lot of it comes from Oda making it mysterious (why he's talking to Gorosei, what Question did he ask Roger, what his "bet" on Luffy actually entails, etc). We can make guesses to why, and thats all I'm doing here with supporting evidence.


That said, Luffy has exclaimed he wants to beat Shanks' ass so there's that:kayneshrug:
Just thinking of something when putting these three posts together.This entire post is headcanon:

If Shanks is the King of Underworld in metaphorical sense (Jirocho = supplying both weapons or facilities to empower both Revos and World Government and making them war against each other) then how about making a parallel with God of The Underworld also in ideology?

What i mean by this:

Shanks may aim to "facilitate/create" the birth of a worthy figure that will lead the war against World Government. Just like some certain people were conspirated about to have orchestrated the World War 1 and 2 - its just my wild imagination taken from your posts lol - what if Shanks is The Mastermind behind the greatest world war ever.

Why would he aim to do this? How's this related to ideology of Underworld King?

I remember Johan Liebert from the manga "Monster" said that the only thing that all humanity equals in, is death. If i try to reach and connect this kind of philosophy to orchestration of one piece world war, then it may connect.

"Life is more important than honor"

Shanks inspired Luffy to become PK. PK Luffy will wage war against WG. By this, Shanks orchestrate PK vs WG. Shanks do this to realize his ideology of death as the bringer of balance.

---

By doing this, which faction is right and wrong, which faction is the most dangerous to let live may become clear to Shanks.

Depending on his philosophy,

- Shanks may support the right faction, fulfilling the balance of the righteous in the world. Achieving peace.
- Or he may choose to eliminate the faction which is the most dangerous to him, fulfilling the balance of strength in the world. And form a treaty with...but also in some subconscious level, control...the remaining side. Achieving peace.
- or he may choose to eliminate BOTH Luffy and Imu after they reach the point of final exhaustion and dying, from battling each other. Fulfilling the balance of life and death. Achieving peace.

---
 
Last edited:
kissing the gorosei's ass doesnt always entail a sinister motive behind it
seems more like shanks is trying to maintain some order . the gorosei share these motives as well.
he saw the threat of an escalating war with kaido going to mf and blocked it
tried to prevent blackbeard and ace confrontation which led to the war
and now he's hinting at a warning about a certain pirate.


did roger and garp think the cd's were morally reprehensible ??? most likely
did they take down the man who aimed to throw down the govt they had set up
most definitely.
 
お頭 just means "Boss" (more specifically the head of group or an organization, it's not specific or characteristic of Yakuza)

If you read the Manga in japanese you will see that countless characters get called that. To name a few:

- Fisher Tiger
- Hody
- Dorry and Broggy
- Kid
- Mikazuki (the pirate that refused to pay Galley-La and got owned back in Water 7
- Don Chinjao

There's nothing special about it
Also nothing special about Akagami. Japanese is a pitch accent language, even though 神 and 髪 are romanized the same way for western plebs, they have different pitch in Japanese, they are pronounced differently
If you try to extract meaning from kanji or the JP version without knowing japanese you're just misleading people
It's like if I make a theory that The Godfather actually stands by The Good Father, and then start talking about how his sons loved him lmao
 
Last edited:
お頭 just means "Boss" (more specifically the head of group or an organization, it's not specific or characteristic of Yakuza)

If you read the Manga in japanese you will see that countless characters get called that. To name a few:

- Fisher Tiger
- Hody
- Dorry and Broggy
- Kid
- Mikazuki (the pirate that refused to pay Galley-La and got owned back in Water 7
- Don Chinjao

There's nothing special about it

It's the fact that it's he is never actually called Captain at all, and is the only Yonko to not be. And Fisher Tiger and Chinjao both carry themselves as a Yakuza like organization. The rest are run very gang like as well. It's the same with Bege. I never said it was "exclusive" to Shanks.

And the point is, that's a strawmans argument because everything else is valid when it comes to relating him with Yakuza references, specifically his Bounty (which IS based based on the actual word Yakuza from Oicho-Kabu)
Post automatically merged:

Gingers have no soul, thats common knowledge.
Lol
Post automatically merged:

kissing the gorosei's ass doesnt always entail a sinister motive behind it
seems more like shanks is trying to maintain some order . the gorosei share these motives as well.
he saw the threat of an escalating war with kaido going to mf and blocked it
tried to prevent blackbeard and ace confrontation which led to the war
and now he's hinting at a warning about a certain pirate.


did roger and garp think the cd's were morally reprehensible ??? most likely
did they take down the man who aimed to throw down the govt they had set up
most definitely.
It does indicate "something" because these men want to stop Luffy and capture Robin.

Do you not find it weird that if Shanks is trying to maintain balance (which I agree with), he's also the reason Luffy has survived and became a pirate? Luffy is someone who's quite literally geared to taking it all down and destroying it, it's just that his methods are different from Blackbeard.

This was my point. I don't believe Shanks is a government dog. Early Gorosei dialogue and his own dialogue prove he's not trying to "change" the world that much, UNLESS he's playing both sides for a reason. Which is the whole point of the thread because as "obvious" as we'd like to think Shanks is, Oda has yet to actually give us actual motivations behind the character..
 
It's the fact that it's he is never actually called Captain at all, and is the only Yonko to not be. And Fisher Tiger and Chinjao both carry themselves as a Yakuza like organization. The rest are run very gang like as well. It's the same with Bege. I never said it was "exclusive" to Shanks.
Lmao at ganglike
It's meaningless bro
If you wanna draw meaning from the Japanese version first you need to learn japanese to a good level
Otherwise you're just saying whatever and misleading people
If you're interested in learning japanese language through media, use this guide https://animecards.site/
Supplement it with a grammar resource like this and you're gold https://www.imabi.net/tableofcontents.htm
Good luck, if you have any questions just ask me in dm
 
Lmao at ganglike
It's meaningless bro
If you wanna draw meaning from the Japanese version first you need to learn japanese to a good level
Otherwise you're just saying whatever and misleading people
If you're interested in learning japanese language through media, use this guide https://animecards.site/
Supplement it with a grammar resource like this and you're gold https://www.imabi.net/tableofcontents.htm
Good luck, if you have any questions just ask me in dm
Did you not actually read my comment about his bounty? Regardless of what you are saying, you are wrong. Shanks HAS clear Yakuza motifs and one of those reasons is because his Bounty directly references Yakuza.

Nothing you say changes that, including your weird "I'm better at Japanese than you bro" mentality. You do not need experience on Japanese to understand these references.

And to be honest, you are criticizing the wrong person. The second half of the that post is not even mine, I make a clear distinction on the OP. It's @ArturCantSpeakJapanese and his points on Shanks. You want to argue, argue with them them. I don't have time to argue nonsense with someone trying to school me on 1 word Japanese games


And yes, Ganglike. Jinbe is called Boss. The Sun Pirates are run like a gang/Yakuza of pirates. Kid's crew is run like a gang/hooligan group of pirates. Chinjao's crew is run like a triad. Bege's crew is run like the mob. How are you not understanding this?
 
Did you not actually read my comment about his bounty? Regardless of what you are saying, you are wrong. Shanks HAS clear Yakuza motifs and one of those reasons is because his Bounty directly references Yakuza.

Nothing you say changes that, including your weird "I'm better at Japanese than you bro" mentality. You do not need experience on Japanese to understand these references.

And to be honest, you are criticizing the wrong person. The second half of the that post is not even mine, I make a clear distinction on the OP. It's @ArturCantSpeakJapanese and his points on Shanks. You want to argue, argue with them them. I don't have time to argue nonsense with someone trying to school me on 1 word Japanese games
i was trying to help u but if u don't want to get helped that's ok
 
i was trying to help u but if u don't want to get helped that's ok
I don't need help to point out that Shanks isnt called Captain and has Yakuza references.

I have a year of college Japanese (I've studied with the Genki books, not anime flashcards....) and don't really care to learn more outside actual N5-N1 learning. I'm not educating people in the language, nor do I want to
 
I don't need help to point out that Shanks isnt called Captain and has Yakuza references.

I have a year of college Japanese (I've studied with the Genki books, not anime flashcards....) and don't really care to learn more outside actual N5-N1 learning. I'm not educating people in the language, nor do I want to
N5-N1 tests are meaningless lmao
And Genki/college are a massive waste of time, as you don't learn japanese through textbooks but through consuming massive amounts of content and interacting with the language
You should really do yourself a favor and read the guide, it will save you.
But it seems like you won't. I guess it doesn't really effect me if you waste years of your life reading genki and never learning any japanese so I'm out
Just don't say nobody warned you
 
N5-N1 tests are meaningless lmao
And Genki/college are a massive waste of time, as you don't learn japanese through textbooks but through consuming content in the language
I know some dude that's gone to language school for 4 years and he can't read anything with kanji in it
You should really do yourself a favor and read the guide, it will save you.
But it seems like you won't. I guess it doesn't really effect me if you waste years of your life reading genki and never learning any japanese so I will call myself out
Just don't say nobody warned you
I literally went through this 8-9 years ago as a freshman in college...I'm not wasting my time at all because I haven't actually pursued any further learning beyond that point or had them time to.
I don't care to, and I'm not sure why this is the conversation being had in this thread. Again, if you want to discuss the language, go ahead and argue with the person who actually made those points and DM them. What is mine is the first half of the OP, which references zero japanese whatsoever and has to do with the actual plot.
 

Uncle Van

Taxes Are a Sickness
That Shimizu Jircoho comparison as a classic one.

I always viewed Shanks as the ultimate gatekeeper who really wants the new age to come, with Luffy being to the one bet on. Shanks probably doesn't care about Luffy himself, but the potential results Luffy can get. Keeping everything stable until the right moment, and that moment is now. Oden was waiting for this current moment where pirates will show up and change the world, so it's safe to assume Shanks was waiting as well.

When Shanks went to the Gorosei about a "certain pirate", I always hoped it was Luffy. Now since it's the right moment, Shanks is now pushing the Gorosei's buttons to get them to take action, which is why they were talking a out the Great Cleansing and Wano immediately after their meeting with Shanks.

Would also explain why Shanks was so serious about WB, BB, Kaido, Ace, Marines etc. not fighting each other. It wasn't the right time for such Era altering battles yet.
 
That Shimizu Jircoho comparison as a classic one.

I always viewed Shanks as the ultimate gatekeeper who really wants the new age to come, with Luffy being to the one bet on. Shanks probably doesn't care about Luffy himself, but the potential results Luffy can get. Keeping everything stable until the right moment, and that moment is now. Oden was waiting for this current moment where pirates will show up and change the world, so it's safe to assume Shanks was waiting as well.

When Shanks went to the Gorosei about a "certain pirate", I always hoped it was Luffy. Now since it's the right moment, Shanks is now pushing the Gorosei's buttons to get them to take action, which is why they were talking a out the Great Cleansing and Wano immediately after their meeting with Shanks.

Would also explain why Shanks was so serious about WB, BB, Kaido, Ace, Marines etc. not fighting each other. It wasn't the right time for such Era altering battles yet.
I like this take, but I have to question if it's entirely altruistic. Being able to even meet with them on its own already seems very weird. Not only that but Shanks never went to Laugh Tale, so it's odd to me that he "knows" when everyone should fight or when the era "should" change.

The big moment really comes from when we actually know his real motivations (not the what, but the why). Him playing the WG or Luffy doesn't entirely matter unless we know why he's actually doing it.



For the record, I believe this is partially the reason, I just think there is more to it because Oda hasn't revealed Shanks' motives or why he's doing it. He's only "alluded" to the idea, which makes be believe it's more complicated than that when you have Shanks' unknown past and hidden dialogue with Roger to contend with.

I do think his methods are going to be questioned by Luffy. Prompting the WG to start a new cleansing before Luffy can even fight back (before he finds OP) seems way too reckless to me
 
Top