Powers & Abilities Why the black blade puts Mihawk and Ryuma above Oden by default

Finalbeta

Hero of Albion
It's not a matter of a "lesser" fighting style, but rather incorporating the two styles into one.

Oda is making it pretty clear with Wano, the Samurai, Oden etc... That there is a distinction between those who are to be considered actual Swordsmen, and those who fight with a sword/weapon to compliment their already established fighting style.

It's always been apparent that there is a difference, otherwise Oda would never had needed to make characters (especially ones Zoro has faced) announce that they are Swordsmen. If everyone with a Sword is a swordsman, then announcing they are Swordsmen is redundant, and makes no sense.
Of course not all sword fighters are swordsmen. Swordsmen are the ones capable of swordsmanship to begin with. Which can be learned and trained.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
It's not a matter of a "lesser" fighting style, but rather incorporating the two styles into one.

Oda is making it pretty clear with Wano, the Samurai, Oden etc... That there is a distinction between those who are to be considered actual Swordsmen, and those who fight with a sword/weapon to compliment their already established fighting style.

It's always been apparent that there is a difference, otherwise Oda would never had needed to make characters (especially ones Zoro has faced) announce that they are Swordsmen. If everyone with a Sword is a swordsman, then announcing they are Swordsmen is redundant, and makes no sense.
No its not.
Do zoro oden and roger fight with swords ?
Yes
Do they coat their swords in haki ?
Yes
Do rhey all use ryou ?
Yes
Tf are you on about.
 
@Celestial D. Dragon Cabaji was spitting fire and kicking you with knifes in his shoes, yet Zoro said if Cabaji considers himself a swordsman, he is not allowed to lose to him. Kaku wasn't a pure swordsman either, as he has the full range of Rokushiki at his disposal. Woud be odd if Zoro, upon losing to Roger, would consider himself the world's strongest because Roger is not a swordsman "in the strictest sense". What would the title be worth if 80% are not swordsmen in the strictest sense?
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
@Celestial D. Dragon Cabaji was spitting fire and kicking you with knifes in his shoes, yet Zoro said if Cabaji considers himself a swordsman, he is not allowed to lose to him. Kaku wasn't a pure swordsman either, as he has the full range of Rokushiki at his disposal. Woud be odd if Zoro, upon losing to Roger, would consider himself the world's strongest because Roger is not a swordsman "in the strictest sense". What would the title be worth if 80% are not swordsmen in the strictest sense?
Fuji and law use their fruits more prominently than their swordsmanship yet oda labelled both swordsman. A non fruit user has no excuse if they dont.
 
@Celestial D. Dragon Cabaji was spitting fire and kicking you with knifes in his shoes, yet Zoro said if Cabaji considers himself a swordsman, he is not allowed to lose to him. Kaku wasn't a pure swordsman either, as he has the full range of Rokushiki at his disposal. Woud be odd if Zoro, upon losing to Roger, would consider himself the world's strongest because Roger is not a swordsman "in the strictest sense". What would the title be worth if 80% are not swordsmen in the strictest sense?
Yes, Cabaji is a Swordsman by his own admission, so that is the path he follows in life. We can't take it any other way, because it is told to us.

Daz Bones says he's not a Swordsman, so by his own admission we cannot classify him as one, even though he seems to fit the build.

So tell me, outside of us knowing Roger knows how to use a sword, what classifies him as a Swordsman, when we know he didn't always use a sword?
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Yes, Cabaji is a Swordsman by his own admission, so that is the path he follows in life. We can't take it any other way, because it is told to us.

Daz Bones says he's not a Swordsman, so by his own admission we cannot classify him as one, even though he seems to fit the build.

So tell me, outside of us knowing Roger knows how to use a sword, what classifies him as a Swordsman, when we know he didn't always use a sword?
Mr 1 didnt have a sword.
What makes roger a swordsman. This
Just going to point out that roger is not only a swordsman but a swordsmaster.
Koshiro teaching zoro swordsmanship and talking about reaching the pinnacle of swordsmanship taught him the basis of ryou (haki)
Mihawk first and only shown lesson to zoro on the "way of the sword" was also teaching him haki and coating his sword. Roger does both those things to an extremely high level. Hes a without a doubt a swordsmaster.
 
There's a reason why the other "world's strongest" title holders are not swordsmen. Whitebeard, the WSM doesn't use a sword but a bisento, Kaido the WSC doesn't use a sword but a club. So Oda makes sure to not give those WS title holders swords at all, instead of giving them swords "among other powers".
Literally this.
There's no inconsistency.
The story makes complete sense and no titles are broken as long as you respect a few key assumptions.

1. Mihawk is the strongest swordsman, so on every list, he should be above: Shanks, Fujitora, and Big Mom.
2. If we're talking about the beginning of pre-time skip, Whitebeard is the strongest man and therefore is above even Mihawk.
So,
Whitebeard > None sword users who are stronger than Mihawk > Mihawk > (sword users + etc).

Post time skip, you can interpret Kaido's "title" in two ways.
Either Oda is saying "people say ..." on purpose because Kaido isn't actually the strongest (which is what I personally think)

(None sword users who are stronger than Mihawk > Mihawk > sword users + etc)
or
Kaido is actually the strongest.
(Kaido > None sword users who are stronger than Mihawk > Mihawk > sword users + etc).

If you maintain these relationships based on the titles, you will not have any inconsistencies with power scaling.
 
Mr 1 didnt have a sword.
What makes roger a swordsman. This
I mean couldn't Roger do those same things with another weapon? If he could coat a Sword in Haki like that, he could do the same with another weapon, just like Zoro was able to coat Killer's scythe. Just cause a Sword is his weapon of choice, it doesn't mean he's a Swordsman in the same sense as Oden/Zoro/Mihawk. Same principle applies to Big Mom. She knows how to use a Sword, but she fights in a multitude of different styles.

Like I said, characters Oda wants us to know who are Swordsman, he explicitly tells the readers in one way or another.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
I mean couldn't Roger do those same things with another weapon? If he could coat a Sword in Haki like that, he could do the same with another weapon, just like Zoro was able to coat Killer's scythe. Just cause a Sword is his weapon of choice, it doesn't mean he's a Swordsman in the same sense as Oden/Zoro/Mihawk. Same principle applies to Big Mom. She knows how to use a Sword, but she fights in a multitude of different styles.

Like I said, characters Oda wants us to know who are Swordsman, he explicitly tells the readers in one way or another.
Oda didnt give roger anything else though did he. He gave him a sword. You have no point.
 
No, by having them, or himself making statements that they are Swordsman.
See that's the problem.
Letting the reader know that a character is a swordsman is as simple as drawing that character with/using a sword multiple times.

But you and other readers have created this notion that certain characters with swords aren't really swordsmen, so you want additional ways for them to be called swordsmen.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Eh, now we're just going to dance in circles, cause I'm right back to bringing up points I already made. We'll agree to disagree. Everything shall be revealed in due time. Back to the spoiler thread to check if it's still a shit show in there.
Youre not right to bring anything up. Youre point is as stupid as me saying zoro isnt a swordsman because oda COULD have given him a bat.
 
See that's the problem.
Letting the reader know that a character is a swordsman is as simple as drawing that character with/using a sword multiple times.

But you and other readers have created this notion that certain characters with swords aren't really swordsmen, so you want additional ways for them to be called swordsmen.
Are you reading through the Wano arc? Oda has made it abundantly obvious that there is a clear distinction between those who can fight with a Sword, and those who should be considered Swordsman in the truest sense.

Youre not right to bring anything up. Youre point is as stupid as me saying zoro isnt a swordsman because oda COULD have given him a bat.
No, you're just being ignorant to the points I am making. You guys just go "Look! A he knows how to use a Sword! Must be a Swordsman!"

You can't even differentiate between those who embody the way of life of a Swordsman like Oden, Mihawk, The Samurai, Zoro, and those who just know how to use a Sword, so they do, to compliment their fight style.

I can't fix your guys ignorance, so this conversation is pointless to continue.
 
Top