I said for Oda.
For Oda, Zoro cut a dragon above the capital. It doesn't matter if the dragon is real or made of magma for him.
The Ryuma's adaptation is the arc where he cut a dragon above the capital. Not before or after that, just that thing.
So I am asking you once again, why the adaptation has the title "103 Mercies Dragon Damnation" ?
Same as the final attack of Zoro ?
The theory "Zoro killing a dragon" was accurate and real. And for Oda, it was a parallel and it happened, simple as that.
But not for us the fans since no one could have guessed that Oda gonna use a shitty alternative, the real dragon was Kaido and not a dragon made of magma by King ....
For Oda, Zoro cut a dragon above the capital. It doesn't matter if the dragon is real or made of magma for him.
The Ryuma's adaptation is the arc where he cut a dragon above the capital. Not before or after that, just that thing.
So I am asking you once again, why the adaptation has the title "103 Mercies Dragon Damnation" ?
The theory "Zoro killing a dragon" was accurate and real. And for Oda, it was a parallel and it happened, simple as that.
But not for us the fans since no one could have guessed that Oda gonna use a shitty alternative, the real dragon was Kaido and not a dragon made of magma by King ....
The two scenes were much more similar down to the type of the "cut" :





