It’s not really semantics but ok.
No, it being irrelevant is not just down to me, it’s down to the story. It doesn’t matter if he has a sword that is connected to Kaido, he can’t do anything to Kaido if he isn’t strong enough.
The story is to say that Zoro won’t be able to damage Kaido, because he isn’t strong enough regardless of the sword. Luffy is learning an beyond advanced form of CoA to get under Kaido’s scales. It doesn’t matter if Zoro has a sword that cut Kaido, because the man that cut Kaido was likely able to use that beyond-advanced form. He was stronger than Zoro. Zoro simply having the sword doesn’t mean anything if he isn’t strong enough.
No, it being irrelevant is not just down to me, it’s down to the story. It doesn’t matter if he has a sword that is connected to Kaido, he can’t do anything to Kaido if he isn’t strong enough.
The story is to say that Zoro won’t be able to damage Kaido, because he isn’t strong enough regardless of the sword. Luffy is learning an beyond advanced form of CoA to get under Kaido’s scales. It doesn’t matter if Zoro has a sword that cut Kaido, because the man that cut Kaido was likely able to use that beyond-advanced form. He was stronger than Zoro. Zoro simply having the sword doesn’t mean anything if he isn’t strong enough.
But you are claiming it is irrelevant which contradicts the manga.
Basing such irrelevance on the perceived strength of Zoro is again just your opinion.