I can sense that Carrot fans can’t take the sarcasm…
like I said, his logic goes like:
Carrot: the sea is a wonderland! (mentioned it once only, never specifically said anything joining the crew)
His mind: that’s it! Carrot is leaving specifically with Straw Hats!
Yamato: I want to set sail with Luffy and get stronger! (More than 3 times)
His mind: no! Yamato is red herring! She’s staying especially since her DF is Wano’s guardian deity! (While we all know who mentions the guardian deity thing is the main villain of the arc)
at this point it’s useless to argue with real proofs and evidences. He will counter the real evidences with his mental gymnastics logical fallacies.
Post automatically merged:
like I said, his logic goes like:
Carrot: the sea is a wonderland! (mentioned it once only, never specifically said anything joining the crew)
His mind: that’s it! Carrot is leaving specifically with Straw Hats!
Yamato: I want to set sail with Luffy and get stronger! (More than 3 times)
His mind: no! Yamato is red herring! She’s staying especially since her DF is Wano’s guardian deity! (While we all know who mentions the guardian deity thing is the main villain of the arc)
at this point it’s useless to argue with real proofs and evidences. He will counter the real evidences with his mental gymnastics logical fallacies.
Plus careful with the strawman, I'm not discarding Yamato only because of this sentence and I'm not regarding Carrot only because of this sentance. But because of all the context, the subtext and all the data I have.
If you keep taking the story one data at a time, you won't get anywhere. You have to take EVERYTHING into account.
When a character that is not part of a group, say that the group WILL accept him, this is indeed a red flag. On the other hand, when a character imposed themself to a group and is accepted, this is a green flag.
Do you understand the difference or am I speaking chinese here ?