Yeah, it actually does. Oda made a distinction with her and everyone else along with Luffy and Zoro. He clearly showed that she is more important, like the other two, and more of a main character.
How interesting, because it was Nami that convinced Luffy to allow them to separate and Nami that made the most important decision of the arc, overruling Sanji who was hesitant to do so.
Belligerently false. When Robin left the crew, it was Zoro and Nami’s reactions that were highlighted the most on the rooftop besides Luffy. When it came to allowing Usopp back to the crew, it was Zoro and Nami who’s opinions were contrasted against each other. When Sanji’s actions were in question on Zou, it was Nami’s opinion vs Zoro’s. When it came to making an incredibly important decision about provoking a Yonko by raiding her territory, it was Nami and Zoro who were present alongside Luffy as they learned why they needed to do so. Usopp and Sanji do not have that.
Nami is second in total panel time, after Luffy. And this was true even during the absence in Dressrosa.
Then you’re blind and need to reread the story.
Saying that she is a leader and third in command is clear to anybody who thinks that leadership is more than just physical strength, and who’s biggest evidence towards someone’s leadership isn’t a scenario in which another person was responsible for their departure and was responsible for the most important decision in the arc.