Have you read what I sent you? No.
Then don't ask, because you are just spitting out propaganda.
Read a fucking newspaper once in a while.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...igher-than-official-number-lancet-study-finds
Numbers are unclear, I sent you 3 points and unbiased reports and you return back with
ThIs BoIlS DoWn To SeMaNtIcS.
No, you are disgusting and lie to defend a theocracy committing a genocide, just because you share the religion of said theocracy.
Pathetic.
Then don't ask, because you are just spitting out propaganda.
Read a fucking newspaper once in a while.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...igher-than-official-number-lancet-study-finds
Numbers are unclear, I sent you 3 points and unbiased reports and you return back with
ThIs BoIlS DoWn To SeMaNtIcS.
No, you are disgusting and lie to defend a theocracy committing a genocide, just because you share the religion of said theocracy.
Pathetic.
I have not disputed any of the actual facts surrounding the war. I have merely been skeptical of the characterization of the war campaign as a genocide.
The point I was getting at with the classification being semantics is that regardless of whether or not you can classify Israel’s actions as a genocide, civilians dying in war is bad and Israelis responsible for war crimes ought to be held accountable.