Have you read what I sent you? No.
Then don't ask, because you are just spitting out propaganda.

Read a fucking newspaper once in a while.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...igher-than-official-number-lancet-study-finds

Numbers are unclear, I sent you 3 points and unbiased reports and you return back with
ThIs BoIlS DoWn To SeMaNtIcS.
No, you are disgusting and lie to defend a theocracy committing a genocide, just because you share the religion of said theocracy.

Pathetic.
What lie did I speak?

I have not disputed any of the actual facts surrounding the war. I have merely been skeptical of the characterization of the war campaign as a genocide.

The point I was getting at with the classification being semantics is that regardless of whether or not you can classify Israel’s actions as a genocide, civilians dying in war is bad and Israelis responsible for war crimes ought to be held accountable.
 
What lie did I speak?

I have not disputed any of the actual facts surrounding the war. I have merely been skeptical of the characterization of the war campaign as a genocide.

The point I was getting at with the classification being semantics is that regardless of whether or not you can classify Israel’s actions as a genocide, civilians dying in war is bad and Israelis responsible for war crimes ought to be held accountable.
Again, you lie through your teeth.
You are skeptical because you do not read anything that goes against your propaganda.
And no, your words are just a pathetic way of minimising what is happening.
It's not just civilians dying.
It's not just war crimes.
 
I have not disputed any of the actual facts surrounding the war. I have merely been skeptical of the characterization of the war campaign as a genocide.
I would argue that many reputable scholars in the areas history and genocide studies classify Israel's operation as a genocide (even Israeli ones, so there is even that layer of anti-bias).

Those arguing against it, typically point out that it doesn't fulfill every check mark of a genocide as per its initial definition that was created in the light of the Holocaust. But that's as far as the legal definition goes. Doesn't mean there isn't nuance from a sociopolitical point of view. Definitions often develop in accordance to new events and data.
 
I would argue that many reputable scholars in the areas history and genocide studies classify Israel's operation as a genocide (even Israeli ones, so there is even that layer of anti-bias).

Those arguing against it, typically point out that it doesn't fulfill every check mark of a genocide as per its initial definition that was created in the light of the Holocaust. But that's as far as the legal definition goes. Doesn't mean there isn't nuance from a sociopolitical point of view. Definitions often develop in accordance to new events and data.
I mean
If we are gonna talk about that

Wouldn't the forced exodus of arabic Jews be also a genocide?

Funny thing is that Gaddafi out of all people pointed out that Israel could it in the ICC
 
Most Jews in Israel nowadays are Arabic Jews who got Ethnically cleansed after 1948 , Gaddafi pointed out that if Arabic Countries took Israel to the ICC Israel could do the same thing and argue that it's citizens are victims of a Mizrahim genocide
I guess that is true, Arabic nations don't want Israel there just as much as the opposite is true, hence why there have been 60 years of war.
I guess only because the US is such a strong presence there is not an all out war in the middle east and so much money is at stake, but that's the basis of the argument that" Israel has a right to exist"
Since we cannot revert back time anymore, the only really solution that doesn't involve genocide or removal of states is a double state solution, where Israel and Palestine are widely recognised by whoever doesn't recognise them.
Otherwise it's gonna be forever war.
 
I would argue that many reputable scholars in the areas history and genocide studies classify Israel's operation as a genocide (even Israeli ones, so there is even that layer of anti-bias).

Those arguing against it, typically point out that it doesn't fulfill every check mark of a genocide as per its initial definition that was created in the light of the Holocaust. But that's as far as the legal definition goes. Doesn't mean there isn't nuance from a sociopolitical point of view. Definitions often develop in accordance to new events and data.
It is certainly a possibility that Israel’s actions could be classified as genocidal.

Ultimately due to how much genocide is based off intent, there is some degree of subjectivity in the assessment.
Post automatically merged:

Again, you lie through your teeth.
You are skeptical because you do not read anything that goes against your propaganda.
And no, your words are just a pathetic way of minimising what is happening.
It's not just civilians dying.
It's not just war crimes.
Refraining from making a certain judgement is not the same thing as lying
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
From what I have seen so far, it's fair to say Trump likes to be in limelight. He's an attention seeker who seek credits but with a very fragile ego.


He won't shy away from taking any credit whatsoever neither he will take any criticism or anyone opposing him well.

So, when a person like him refuses to release the files which he promised, it only means one thing - his name is in there or name of someone who has close ties with him is in there.

There is no way Trump would let this opportunity to take credits slide by not releasing the files unless his own reputation is at stake.


Heck, I feel this entire Tariffs stuffs has nothing to do with USA strategic trade interests or Russia because if anyone would be harmed the most then it would be USA itself..... So, it's more to do with Trump personality.

Perhaps could be the tactic to divert attention from files release pressure which was mounting on him....

Or could be because he's unable to strike peace in Russia - Ukraine and Israel -Palestine
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
It is certainly a possibility that Israel’s actions could be classified as genocidal.

Ultimately due to how much genocide is based off intent, there is some degree of subjectivity in the assessment.
Post automatically merged:


Refraining from making a certain judgement is not the same thing as lying
Semantics, your only resort.
I hope one day you will think about the words you say and realise what a garbage opinion it is, and what horrible behaviour you excuse in the name of a made up conviction that you joined just to fit in.

You defeat a culture just because you want to be part of it, the worst kind of apologist.
 

I would argue that, based on him letting corporations run rampant and suck the life out of the proletariat, forcible slavery is just about as American as it gets :ultimoji:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory...ence-global-124788880?cid=social_twitter_abcn

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru.../abcnews/library/media/570537332&id=124788598

https://abcnews.go.com/US/smithsoni...-limits-presidential-power/story?id=124271509


This cunt is dragging the US and the world back to the middle ages holy shit
Post automatically merged:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/restoring-truth-and-sanity-to-american-history/

This fucking text
Full of manipulation and lies
Ministry of truth
 
Last edited:
Semantics, your only resort.
I hope one day you will think about the words you say and realise what a garbage opinion it is, and what horrible behaviour you excuse in the name of a made up conviction that you joined just to fit in.

You defeat a culture just because you want to be part of it, the worst kind of apologist.
I mean, I haven’t excused anything. I said people guilty of war crimes, of which I fully acknowledge exists, should be held accountable.
 
Top