Questions & Mysteries Did Zoro lose against Enel
- Thread starter Tai long
- Start date
I provided all the arguments why Zoro didnt lose to Enel and why author thinks the same.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
I provided all the arguments why Zoro didnt lose to Enel and why author thinks the same.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
I provided all the arguments why Zoro didnt lose to Enel and why author thinks the same.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
You, on the other side, couldnt even explain my first paragrapf in the first quote.
Start back there and try to work your way up.
No, I am a fanboy who understands that Zoro lost after a gauntlet.
You need to get over the fact that Enel or anyone else doesnt count as a loss for Zoro. Author's own words.
If Oda was sitting face to face with you, would you still be saying the same nonsense while looking the man in the eyes?
Oda is literally telling us that Zoro never lost against Mihawk...
Getting defeated after a gauntlet doesnt count as a loss, author's own words. lol
King didnt take any damage before facing Zoro because he spent the whole time in flame mode which makes him invulnerable.
Neither Marco nor Zoro's Oni Giri could have dealt damage because flame mode was on.
Falling after a gauntlet isnt held as a loss against anyone. Not against Zoro, not against anyone else.
its like the bible. you can't take Zoro's words literally. its like hililuk's when does a man die speech. he offered Mihawk his life as consolation for losing and accepted defeat. a total loss.
if he meant never lose a battle hes been defeated by just about all of luffys opponents. lucchi tossed him like a salad, hody i think beat him in some way, yeti bros put him to sleep so did enel so did moria and oz mr three turned him into a chad candle. you get setbacks in the pirate game its part of the territory.
i think Zoro meant he'll never give up again or something of the manner. he was but a frog in the well when Mihawk met him and introduced him to the true sea(literally) .
if he meant never lose a battle hes been defeated by just about all of luffys opponents. lucchi tossed him like a salad, hody i think beat him in some way, yeti bros put him to sleep so did enel so did moria and oz mr three turned him into a chad candle. you get setbacks in the pirate game its part of the territory.
i think Zoro meant he'll never give up again or something of the manner. he was but a frog in the well when Mihawk met him and introduced him to the true sea(literally) .
But he literally did.
He never considered gauntlet a loss.
Neither getting kicked nor avoiding Kuma's every hit.
Your agenda piece is too weak.
But I would love to see your logic applied to Kaido losing to Zoro.
He never considered gauntlet a loss.
Neither getting kicked nor avoiding Kuma's every hit.
Your agenda piece is too weak.
But I would love to see your logic applied to Kaido losing to Zoro.
Post automatically merged:
Which meant that he did never include non-swordsmen and lost to Enel anyway.
But he literally didnt... You keep ignoring the context.
That's why you dont understand why Oda disagrees with your headcanons.
Everyone is included in Zoro's promise and he never lost outside a gauntlet.
It's really not that complicated when you abandon anti-Zolo agendas.
Which part of "gauntlet" do you not understand? It's a single word.
It's not possible that you dont understand it, you conveniently ignore it. :yasu:
Complain to the author, it's his words, not mine...
Also, argue this:
That's why you dont understand why Oda disagrees with your headcanons.
Everyone is included in Zoro's promise and he never lost outside a gauntlet.
It's really not that complicated when you abandon anti-Zolo agendas.
I'm explaining to you how Zoro lost and you come up with huge mental gymnastics. Like, what am I supposed to do then?
If this...
... isn't convincing, what else could be? That's right, nothing.
If this...
... isn't convincing, what else could be? That's right, nothing.
It's not possible that you dont understand it, you conveniently ignore it. :yasu:
Complain to the author, it's his words, not mine...
Also, argue this: