So we are using mental gymnastics to say that Hamas attacked FIRST ignoring the context because hamas caused the latest development of a 50 year conflict.
Saying that Hamas attacked first is False.
Just blatantly.
You can say that it sparked the latest development, whatever, it's irrelevant. Because you cannot say that Hamas attacked first when there are tangible proof of the opposite. Because the conflict itself started BEFORE the creation of Hamas.
Saying that Hamas attacked first is False.
Just blatantly.
You can say that it sparked the latest development, whatever, it's irrelevant. Because you cannot say that Hamas attacked first when there are tangible proof of the opposite. Because the conflict itself started BEFORE the creation of Hamas.
a shame he decided to engage in virtue signaling and white washing the war crimes of an apartheid state.