Atheism is tbe rejection of a creator's existence WHICH IS WHY IT IS CONTRARY TO THIESM
You seem to be under the impression that theism is the only way where you have a belief in a creator.
But there is still deism as well.
And atheism is only the negation of theism.
I already explained this a couple times
[automerge]1690573383[/automerge]
No belief in the existence of god ≠ no belief at all
Sure, atheism is about not having a belief in god.
I still believe in bigfoot as i mentioned before. Thats possible of course.
That still doesnt necessarily mean atheists have to believe god doesnt or cant exist.
Thats where the shit i explained like 4 times now come into play, with implicit/weak atheism vs explicit/strong atheism
Dont know if there are studies about the ratio of these 2, but from my experience there are more where implicit atheism applies. Because explicit atheism is kinda retarded and unreasonable, since the inexistence of god(s) cannot be proven
[automerge]1690573457[/automerge]
So do you actively believe in a god or gods?
If the answer is "no" then congrats, you are also an atheist
[automerge]1690573625[/automerge]
Takes me back to "homology has nothing to do with evolution" but i digress
Lmao i never said that. Kinda funny considering you said in this post im the one who cant read
But i guess i return the favor: your garbage line of reasoning on this topic is no surprise considering you are an evolution denier
[automerge]1690573746[/automerge]
Even the idea that its lack of belief alone is wrong since then you have to provide your notion of creation amd existence of the universe which the only way and atheist can explain is through natrual causes.
Or, and hear me out here, we can just say "i dont know" about shit we dont know?!?!?!?
Crazy i know