[FNZ] Role Madness Jujutsu Kaisen Mafia - Shibuya Incident [Game Ended = Mafia + Traitor + Neutral Indie Won!]
- Thread starter Emil
- Start date
- Tags gojo > sukuna midnight is a simp nanami rachet-chan
- Status
@Ratchet here is my concern with you.
You pretend that I came out on broki based on what you said - tbh, you should stop seeing that world revolves around you. You utterly disregarded that two people can come up with same conclusion.
Then, you say cal highlighted connection between broki and me which is based on one post but at the same time said that my case on others is devoid of info.
Double standards🤷
Your case is based on one post which I made in response to broki post
Right at the beginning I quoted conqi saying that and he liked the post which made me believe he definitely has some mech for sure and voted her
Seeing her reaction I said my vote stays on her
Till this time I didn't even quote broki. It was broki who quoted me by making above post
And, all I did is make a response. That's all.
Cal build whole premise that I am bussing broki based on one post. Isn't this lack of evidence?
And, when I gave my reads - and, I am surprised how people whom I gave netural/scum read in that started sussing me immediately after that - you, prof, hime....
Now, I subbed in last night. Obviously, I haven't read whole game and my reads are intuitive and it should have been obvious. Yet, I noticed that prof, hime and you made a sus.
What you did is opportunistic af. More so when you didn't push me for pressure vote. You simply wanted my wagon to build and expected people to pick on it because you voted me.
If you really wanted to solve my slot you would have pushed me but instead you actually wanted people to pick on your vote.
That's why you are scum
You pretend that I came out on broki based on what you said - tbh, you should stop seeing that world revolves around you. You utterly disregarded that two people can come up with same conclusion.
Then, you say cal highlighted connection between broki and me which is based on one post but at the same time said that my case on others is devoid of info.
Double standards🤷
Your case is based on one post which I made in response to broki post
Right at the beginning I quoted conqi saying that and he liked the post which made me believe he definitely has some mech for sure and voted her
Seeing her reaction I said my vote stays on her
Till this time I didn't even quote broki. It was broki who quoted me by making above post
And, all I did is make a response. That's all.
Cal build whole premise that I am bussing broki based on one post. Isn't this lack of evidence?
And, when I gave my reads - and, I am surprised how people whom I gave netural/scum read in that started sussing me immediately after that - you, prof, hime....
Now, I subbed in last night. Obviously, I haven't read whole game and my reads are intuitive and it should have been obvious. Yet, I noticed that prof, hime and you made a sus.
What you did is opportunistic af. More so when you didn't push me for pressure vote. You simply wanted my wagon to build and expected people to pick on it because you voted me.
If you really wanted to solve my slot you would have pushed me but instead you actually wanted people to pick on your vote.
That's why you are scum
- Status