What interest does a business empire have to finish the (quite literally) best fuel for fandom activity in a long-term story, a rivalry so explicit throughout the years that Kaku and Jabra are a thing, or arguing on who took the Pacifista down is a thing, or getting salty because your supposed inferior is worth 1000 men and has a higher bounty is a thing?
I couldn't care less about feats because they mainly require either making up categories ("Pica is YC3 level, don't you see?!"), standards of strength ("Wow, that attack was bigger than this other attack, therefore is more impressive and strong!"), overrating of actions ("Amazing, Woro is doing better than Luffy in this fight, top tier since timeskip!") and so on. If I say Sanji was dominating Page One some Zoro fan will come up with filler from the anime, say that they were equal or whatever; if I say Sanji survived with zero damage an attack by a King going for the kill I will be answered something like "Sanji was defeated and that's why he didn't do anything for this amount of panels that were centered on other events!"; if I say Vergo is way stronger than Pica, Pica was defeated an arc after Vergo, Sanji was weakened because of Caesar... it won't matter because some user will come and say that's all false because of whatever; if I say he hurt the tankiest Charlotte son with a base kick someone will say Oven was perfectly fine, it was Pound who sent him flying, and such stuff; and so on.
And, at the end of the day, I see One Piece "power scaling" as an organic scenario in which one thing doesn't necessarily indicate anything of what others infere and plot is almost always more influential on "feats" and "portrayal" than any other factor, and therefore I couldn't care less about the video-game logic some users apply here and that to me makes next to zero sense.
I couldn't care less about feats because they mainly require either making up categories ("Pica is YC3 level, don't you see?!"), standards of strength ("Wow, that attack was bigger than this other attack, therefore is more impressive and strong!"), overrating of actions ("Amazing, Woro is doing better than Luffy in this fight, top tier since timeskip!") and so on. If I say Sanji was dominating Page One some Zoro fan will come up with filler from the anime, say that they were equal or whatever; if I say Sanji survived with zero damage an attack by a King going for the kill I will be answered something like "Sanji was defeated and that's why he didn't do anything for this amount of panels that were centered on other events!"; if I say Vergo is way stronger than Pica, Pica was defeated an arc after Vergo, Sanji was weakened because of Caesar... it won't matter because some user will come and say that's all false because of whatever; if I say he hurt the tankiest Charlotte son with a base kick someone will say Oven was perfectly fine, it was Pound who sent him flying, and such stuff; and so on.
And, at the end of the day, I see One Piece "power scaling" as an organic scenario in which one thing doesn't necessarily indicate anything of what others infere and plot is almost always more influential on "feats" and "portrayal" than any other factor, and therefore I couldn't care less about the video-game logic some users apply here and that to me makes next to zero sense.
