- Status
Gonna give my reads briefly. And they will be brief in word count too.
No. We need info. The best way to gain info is on our terms, the town's. If we allowed Mafia to have the initiative, we don't get the full scope of interactions. We see only what they want us to see.
Short read on Yo Tan. I think he's real solid. Not many posts but I think the fact he's giving voluntary reads and putting himself out there is a good start.
I really like Sera this game. He's noticing inconsistencies in a player who hasn't done/said much and presented them to NW. And NW's response seemed very off to me. Whether deliberate or otherwise, NW strikes me as more panicked / worried that Sera has them in his sights. And it's a good case build up too.
[
There isn't much to say. Don is a total blank in terms of actual contributions. Like Lanji but to a lesser extent, because he's. . Consistent, but it's not good either way. Most of Don's posts do not add anything. They do not encourage discussion. They simple sit, and allow Don to say he's here. Don, if this is your true town play style, I think you need to be more proactive.
It's not even like he pops in to take a side, from what I've seen. Don is just here. So he's not trying to steer conversation, even subtly. But he's persisting in posting / being a more active player (as far as I've seen) than most. Sooo.... Why? What's his angle, if he's not going to really talk that much? I don't think I quoted a majority of his replies, I think I stopped. But this gives us a good sample of what he's doing and what we can expect in future days. Bottom line is; Don isn't helping town out.
In a game like Mafia where the only way we can understand who is and isn't against us, is activity and conversation. So, just from you participating in the game but not doing much, soft-forms an opinion for me.
You give us nothing but talk constantly, so I need to automatically push you in a negative light. Not locking you in. But letting you know that you need to change it up for Day 2.
I lean towards Nana being town. She seems active and ready to engage when she's here, questioning Lanji (once or twice IIRC) about his own silence. Part of it might be because I feel like she understands my issues with Bogard to a T (much like Drago) and is reinforcing them. But she isn't going so far as to condemn Bogard either, at least what I've seen. She keeps her mind open about both of us but says the reason we're arguing is dumb.
This is a leveled response and I appreciate that. She concisely gave her views on the topic while wrapping it up.
I can't remember if you made any stalwart stance on Bogard and I. Could you repeat that, if you did?
Also, on your reads as a whole in this section of my quotes;
Agreed with your reviews of Sera / Yo Tan Wa. Both give townie vibes from me. Yo Tan is very open whereas Sera is going after NW for discrepencies he's spotted and NW's response hasn't thrilled me.
Don also seems odd to me. But his play style is this, so it's tough to read. Either way, I don't have him as townie right now. Finalbeta still feels weird to me. He's not as aggressive as usual, so I don't want to instantly call him town either. Kiwi picked up the pace so I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt here.
Why would you lump Ha0 with Don? We have more reason to suspect Don. He's a more experienced Mafia player, albeit by a few more games. He's been around talking consistently since Day 1 and hasn't tried to contribute anything. I give Ha0 more benefit of the doubt since this is his second time playing a game of this genre, total. Besides, you think Ha0 is neutral and Don is bad. So you should want Don gone more.
So the closest Lanji gets to an opinion on this matter is parroting me but doing so in a lackadaisical manner. "Oh well, Bogard said this about TAC and it wasn't true. HOW WEIRD." as if waiting to see if this line of thinking would gain more momentum. It doesn't help that the other comments up until this point are not... Important in the least?
Note: I quoted most but not all of Lanji's comments. So maybe I missed something that was slightly more pertinent to the game, but I don't believe I did. Early on, Lanji seems to talk to talk and "be there" and has no real major swing on Bogard and I's arguments. At best, he lazily takes my side to float the idea of Bogard being scum, but doesn't pursue it much.
So slightly more "game looking" posts, but again. He does not take a side. He spits the facts, but not his views on what's happening around him. There's no greater inference or decision to take part of a conversation. He's just there. In Mafia, especially a game like this, I feel like there shouldn't be a reason to pass up on your opinions. Unless you're trying to pull some 190 IQ move and trap scum in some argument, which I doubt from Lanji (no offense) then why is he more on the timid side?
Again.. Tagging people but not contributing.
Second time he mentions that Bogard is being like him last game. They're both wrong about me, but I don't think it's similar in the least. Lanji had more of a reason to suspect me.
So we get the first bit of concrete info, he now thinks we're both townie... I think this is after Dragomir mentions it, so it's a safe opinion. So far almost nobody has accused Drago of not being town, so I take this less as Lanji coming around and more trying to blend in with popular opinion.
I find NW much more sus than Sera, based on their interaction. Seems like Sera was just asking for a reason why NW's views changed games and NW deliberately took the conversation in another direction. I don't get what you mean by low activity when Sera's been pretty good with reads / commentary in regards to the NW discussion, sussing out an inconsistency and pursing it.
There are other players quieter that you could go after, if low activity is what you were really worried about.
It just feels very off how much you're talking and how you don't contribute much. Any reads you give are so very short lived and barely without any reason to give them substance. They have no legs to walk, just "hmmm. I sus Sera. Or, maybe Nana."
For your activity in this game (as in the rate of being around / posts) you seem to be doing an awful lot of nothing. Which does not mesh well with your prior game, in my experience, where Day 1 you were very active and inquired on most players. IDK if you changed because of your botched lynch or if that's just going to be your cover for a mixed up meta. I just don't like your mouth running and nothing coming out of it. Nor do I like your reads on Nana/Sera, who I read as town as of now.
No. We need info. The best way to gain info is on our terms, the town's. If we allowed Mafia to have the initiative, we don't get the full scope of interactions. We see only what they want us to see.
Short read on Yo Tan. I think he's real solid. Not many posts but I think the fact he's giving voluntary reads and putting himself out there is a good start.
I'll first have to read all 14 pages
I hope there is something worthwhile in so many pages
I hope there is something worthwhile in so many pages
Jesus Tac can't catch a break 
I really like Sera this game. He's noticing inconsistencies in a player who hasn't done/said much and presented them to NW. And NW's response seemed very off to me. Whether deliberate or otherwise, NW strikes me as more panicked / worried that Sera has them in his sights. And it's a good case build up too.
@Queen I still don’t trust you from the last game you fooled me
I’ve been quite bc i have to read the last 8 pages.
I’ve been quite bc i have to read the last 8 pages.
[
There isn't much to say. Don is a total blank in terms of actual contributions. Like Lanji but to a lesser extent, because he's. . Consistent, but it's not good either way. Most of Don's posts do not add anything. They do not encourage discussion. They simple sit, and allow Don to say he's here. Don, if this is your true town play style, I think you need to be more proactive.
It's not even like he pops in to take a side, from what I've seen. Don is just here. So he's not trying to steer conversation, even subtly. But he's persisting in posting / being a more active player (as far as I've seen) than most. Sooo.... Why? What's his angle, if he's not going to really talk that much? I don't think I quoted a majority of his replies, I think I stopped. But this gives us a good sample of what he's doing and what we can expect in future days. Bottom line is; Don isn't helping town out.
In a game like Mafia where the only way we can understand who is and isn't against us, is activity and conversation. So, just from you participating in the game but not doing much, soft-forms an opinion for me.
You give us nothing but talk constantly, so I need to automatically push you in a negative light. Not locking you in. But letting you know that you need to change it up for Day 2.
I lean towards Nana being town. She seems active and ready to engage when she's here, questioning Lanji (once or twice IIRC) about his own silence. Part of it might be because I feel like she understands my issues with Bogard to a T (much like Drago) and is reinforcing them. But she isn't going so far as to condemn Bogard either, at least what I've seen. She keeps her mind open about both of us but says the reason we're arguing is dumb.
This is a leveled response and I appreciate that. She concisely gave her views on the topic while wrapping it up.
I can't remember if you made any stalwart stance on Bogard and I. Could you repeat that, if you did?
Also, on your reads as a whole in this section of my quotes;
Agreed with your reviews of Sera / Yo Tan Wa. Both give townie vibes from me. Yo Tan is very open whereas Sera is going after NW for discrepencies he's spotted and NW's response hasn't thrilled me.
Don also seems odd to me. But his play style is this, so it's tough to read. Either way, I don't have him as townie right now. Finalbeta still feels weird to me. He's not as aggressive as usual, so I don't want to instantly call him town either. Kiwi picked up the pace so I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt here.
I am not beating around the bush 
if u want ppl to follow your plan u gotta do it yourself that's what I said
who u gonna vote ?
I am not in favor of no lynch, we can't waste a 48h in the end so we don't lynch anyone cuz ppl wanna do it safely
if u want ppl to follow your plan u gotta do it yourself that's what I saidwho u gonna vote ?
I am not in favor of no lynch, we can't waste a 48h in the end so we don't lynch anyone cuz ppl wanna do it safely
tacs comment
"Well, I read the OP post but I got really confused when the poster above mentioned a 48 hour day phase."
bogards
"At the beginning, i was only joking, but i find it suspicious that he decided to ask a less experienced mafia player about mafia setup instead of believing what he presumably read in opening posts, and then later on turning back the clock into claiming he didn't read it at all. "
not what he claimed at all. irc a bit scarred from last day 1
but its a bit weird.
"Well, I read the OP post but I got really confused when the poster above mentioned a 48 hour day phase."
bogards
"At the beginning, i was only joking, but i find it suspicious that he decided to ask a less experienced mafia player about mafia setup instead of believing what he presumably read in opening posts, and then later on turning back the clock into claiming he didn't read it at all. "
not what he claimed at all. irc a bit scarred from last day 1
but its a bit weird.
So the closest Lanji gets to an opinion on this matter is parroting me but doing so in a lackadaisical manner. "Oh well, Bogard said this about TAC and it wasn't true. HOW WEIRD." as if waiting to see if this line of thinking would gain more momentum. It doesn't help that the other comments up until this point are not... Important in the least?
Note: I quoted most but not all of Lanji's comments. So maybe I missed something that was slightly more pertinent to the game, but I don't believe I did. Early on, Lanji seems to talk to talk and "be there" and has no real major swing on Bogard and I's arguments. At best, he lazily takes my side to float the idea of Bogard being scum, but doesn't pursue it much.
I have
oh the disrespect
tac asked neutral a question
bogard insist he is a scum hiding that by acting like a noob
tac says he read the op but misunderstood something that neutral might have had head on.
bogard insist tac is playing noob , also insist tac claims to have read and backtracked on the reading the info for day 1.
problem is tac only said he misunderstood it.
tac might have played scum a bit too much in this game for players to trust him lmao.
do note there is currently a lynch on tac.
bogard insist he is a scum hiding that by acting like a noob
tac says he read the op but misunderstood something that neutral might have had head on.
bogard insist tac is playing noob , also insist tac claims to have read and backtracked on the reading the info for day 1.
problem is tac only said he misunderstood it.
tac might have played scum a bit too much in this game for players to trust him lmao.
do note there is currently a lynch on tac.
Again.. Tagging people but not contributing.
Second time he mentions that Bogard is being like him last game. They're both wrong about me, but I don't think it's similar in the least. Lanji had more of a reason to suspect me.
So we get the first bit of concrete info, he now thinks we're both townie... I think this is after Dragomir mentions it, so it's a safe opinion. So far almost nobody has accused Drago of not being town, so I take this less as Lanji coming around and more trying to blend in with popular opinion.
I find NW much more sus than Sera, based on their interaction. Seems like Sera was just asking for a reason why NW's views changed games and NW deliberately took the conversation in another direction. I don't get what you mean by low activity when Sera's been pretty good with reads / commentary in regards to the NW discussion, sussing out an inconsistency and pursing it.
There are other players quieter that you could go after, if low activity is what you were really worried about.
It just feels very off how much you're talking and how you don't contribute much. Any reads you give are so very short lived and barely without any reason to give them substance. They have no legs to walk, just "hmmm. I sus Sera. Or, maybe Nana."
For your activity in this game (as in the rate of being around / posts) you seem to be doing an awful lot of nothing. Which does not mesh well with your prior game, in my experience, where Day 1 you were very active and inquired on most players. IDK if you changed because of your botched lynch or if that's just going to be your cover for a mixed up meta. I just don't like your mouth running and nothing coming out of it. Nor do I like your reads on Nana/Sera, who I read as town as of now.
So; For Mafia I have a bit of a more gradient style view on scum and how I pursue them. Let me just give you the quick legend.
100% Townie — I have proof they are a townie or the logic behind them being anything else is beyond the pale
Townie — Someone who's game play strongly reflects a townie for me. But I am not willing to overlook odd things about them.
Leaning Town — Neutral-ish positive. Players who I have no reason to sus as bad based on their limited actions, and I presume to be town for the time being. But it's a weak thought.
Leaning Scum — Neutral-ish negative. Someone who I think is suspicious for one reason or another. I have no immediate good reason to vote them or to build a case, but I keep my eye on them
Suspicious Player — Someone who I am fairly certain is scum of some variety. I would be happy to vote them off if I had no better options. Not someone I'd immediately go to TO vote off though.
Scum — Basically someone whose actions are so blatant there is no other reason to them.
Dragomir
Cinera
Seraphoenix
Celestia
Kiwi
Yo Tan Wan
Jew D. Boy
Ha0
Reborn
Finalbeta
Queen
Don
Rej
Playa
All Red
Rayan
Neutral Watcher
Lanji
Bogard
I'm on the fance for Queen/Final Beta. I guess you could swap them in either direction. Most of the Leaning Scum are inactives who I have no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt for. Better to start off skeptical. Neutral Watcher seems very off based on his exchange with Seraphoenix, Lanji's different play style and lack of any real views puts him there for me too. We all know why I want Bogard gone.
I hope this tiered system makes sense. Suspicious = / = auto mean scum for me.
100% Townie — I have proof they are a townie or the logic behind them being anything else is beyond the pale
Townie — Someone who's game play strongly reflects a townie for me. But I am not willing to overlook odd things about them.
Leaning Town — Neutral-ish positive. Players who I have no reason to sus as bad based on their limited actions, and I presume to be town for the time being. But it's a weak thought.
Leaning Scum — Neutral-ish negative. Someone who I think is suspicious for one reason or another. I have no immediate good reason to vote them or to build a case, but I keep my eye on them
Suspicious Player — Someone who I am fairly certain is scum of some variety. I would be happy to vote them off if I had no better options. Not someone I'd immediately go to TO vote off though.
Scum — Basically someone whose actions are so blatant there is no other reason to them.
__________________________________________________
My Reads:
My Reads:
Dragomir
Cinera
Seraphoenix
Celestia
Kiwi
Yo Tan Wan
Jew D. Boy
Ha0
Reborn
Finalbeta
Queen
Don
Rej
Playa
All Red
Rayan
Neutral Watcher
Lanji
Bogard
I'm on the fance for Queen/Final Beta. I guess you could swap them in either direction. Most of the Leaning Scum are inactives who I have no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt for. Better to start off skeptical. Neutral Watcher seems very off based on his exchange with Seraphoenix, Lanji's different play style and lack of any real views puts him there for me too. We all know why I want Bogard gone.
I hope this tiered system makes sense. Suspicious = / = auto mean scum for me.
I want to clarify something real quick;
I am not going to return to that argument with Bogard unless I truly have to. Both sides have said our thoughts on it, and we're at a crucial impasse where Bogard thinks I am scum for not rescinding my declaration of dishonesty cast against him. And I see no reason to give Bogard the leniency for his interpretation given how he's played.
So I don't think I will entertain this argument anymore. I hope you understand that.
I am not going to return to that argument with Bogard unless I truly have to. Both sides have said our thoughts on it, and we're at a crucial impasse where Bogard thinks I am scum for not rescinding my declaration of dishonesty cast against him. And I see no reason to give Bogard the leniency for his interpretation given how he's played.
So I don't think I will entertain this argument anymore. I hope you understand that.
D
@TheAncientCenturion Celestia has recently gained some incrimination coming several sides. Reborn and I have both made our cases. Since you town read her, could you check out those cases and tell me what you think? They're on this page btw.
I must say that's quite impressive detailed read you have given especially if I assume that you are uninformed townie and this day being just day one.
Anyway, lanji case seem Worth exploring more.
However, I have few questions for you.
you have placed Celestia in townie read (someone whose game strongly reflect twonie).
Question 1)have you build your read on Celestia and placed her as townie after reading the case build on her by me and drago on page 28? If yes, then expand on it
Question 2) if no, then I am curious what you think about what I and drago said about her on page 28? Do you after reading our cases on her still see her strong townie?
Question 3) why you sus queen and finalbeta?
Anyway, lanji case seem Worth exploring more.
However, I have few questions for you.
you have placed Celestia in townie read (someone whose game strongly reflect twonie).
Question 1)have you build your read on Celestia and placed her as townie after reading the case build on her by me and drago on page 28? If yes, then expand on it
Question 2) if no, then I am curious what you think about what I and drago said about her on page 28? Do you after reading our cases on her still see her strong townie?
Question 3) why you sus queen and finalbeta?
I find Reborn's phrasing to be a little dishonest / not fully encompassing tbh.
She didn't define everything Ha0 posted as random like Reborn made it sound. Just his immediate posts. She has it split into sections with commentary compatible to them. She doesn't refer to anything from him as random again nor did she use the random context as her new reasoning for going after Ha0.
The reason she is suspicious of Ha0 is because of his posts not contributing—same reason I don't have full confidence in Don—but broadens her reasoning based on Ha0's inconsistencies. Such as being sus of Bogard, so she says, but voting for her immediately. To me, it seems like Nana is just holding Ha0 to a higher standard despite this being just his second game. It's understandable on paper for her to go after Ha0, especially if she reread the thread and saw this pattern with him. I disagree with her results though, Ha0 hasn't hit me as scum.
Just a little bit extra I checked; Nana's post regarding her neutral standard on Ha0 was from 9 AM Eastern time to her push on Ha0 in her larger synopsis a page ago at 3 PM. That's what, 5/6 hours difference and seemingly Nana reread the thread to pull early quotes from Ha0? It's more than enough time for Nana to change her stance and seemingly, she reread content that would lend credence to the idea that she isn't just going for an easy lynch.
It seems like shallow reasons to go after her.
____
For your player salad, I'm going back in the quotes and the furtherest I get without having to heavy into it is this;
So it seems like this comment;
Is between a small group of players? Potentially just 2? If that is the case, then this doesn't feel like Player Salad like you described. She's willing to lynch any of [the players she suspects] that seem to be previously outlined.
Maybe because I'm not really familiar with stuff like this, but I strongly doubt what Nana's doing fits in with that definition. She has a limited number (I think 2) players she is willing to lynch and that seems narrowed down. If you suspect 2 people, would you not say something similar?
She didn't define everything Ha0 posted as random like Reborn made it sound. Just his immediate posts. She has it split into sections with commentary compatible to them. She doesn't refer to anything from him as random again nor did she use the random context as her new reasoning for going after Ha0.
The reason she is suspicious of Ha0 is because of his posts not contributing—same reason I don't have full confidence in Don—but broadens her reasoning based on Ha0's inconsistencies. Such as being sus of Bogard, so she says, but voting for her immediately. To me, it seems like Nana is just holding Ha0 to a higher standard despite this being just his second game. It's understandable on paper for her to go after Ha0, especially if she reread the thread and saw this pattern with him. I disagree with her results though, Ha0 hasn't hit me as scum.
Just a little bit extra I checked; Nana's post regarding her neutral standard on Ha0 was from 9 AM Eastern time to her push on Ha0 in her larger synopsis a page ago at 3 PM. That's what, 5/6 hours difference and seemingly Nana reread the thread to pull early quotes from Ha0? It's more than enough time for Nana to change her stance and seemingly, she reread content that would lend credence to the idea that she isn't just going for an easy lynch.
It seems like shallow reasons to go after her.
____
For your player salad, I'm going back in the quotes and the furtherest I get without having to heavy into it is this;
So it seems like this comment;
Is between a small group of players? Potentially just 2? If that is the case, then this doesn't feel like Player Salad like you described. She's willing to lynch any of [the players she suspects] that seem to be previously outlined.
Maybe because I'm not really familiar with stuff like this, but I strongly doubt what Nana's doing fits in with that definition. She has a limited number (I think 2) players she is willing to lynch and that seems narrowed down. If you suspect 2 people, would you not say something similar?
What inconsistencies ?
I said if i was pushed for a name i am sus of bogard
And i gave her every chance to explain herself yet she couldnt. And the vote on her has been explained too. If i just wanted to do a bandwagon vote on her id have done it when reborn did and dragomir agreed with him that would be the easy way out.
Yet shes continued to push the agenda with no real basis. At the end of it she may not scum but the way shes played the game has been shit.
I said if i was pushed for a name i am sus of bogard
And i gave her every chance to explain herself yet she couldnt. And the vote on her has been explained too. If i just wanted to do a bandwagon vote on her id have done it when reborn did and dragomir agreed with him that would be the easy way out.
Yet shes continued to push the agenda with no real basis. At the end of it she may not scum but the way shes played the game has been shit.
Thanks. I figured out how multi quote functioned thanks to Yo Tan, but I had to copy paste bits all around to organize it. So not everything will be 100% in order. I tried my best though.
Definitely. Him and Don need to talk more—based on what they say, I can be more confident on their standings.
I was aware Drago and you made a case against Nana, but I did not read it much before finishing my own post. More or less skimmed without looking into the details.
Yes. I still see her as town. I feel like with the potentially 6 hour difference between "Neutral" and "Bad" alongside Nana having gone back to earlier phases of the thread, we can chalk that up as a player changing their perspective more so than an inconsistency.
I feel like your "Random" bit is reaching, too.
I feel like Beta isn't playing to his meta? Nothing more to say, usually he's a lot more aggressive as a scum hunter. He has a suspect within the first 24 hours, and in the elongated day phase, it feels like he's just been passing on info and giving his thoughts here or there. Could be wrong, I'll admit he wasn't my biggest focus on the reread.
Queen just feels off due to her lack of presence. She's a very smart person and a good player. I guess I just expect more activity / solid results from the better players, and when I don't see that, I have to wonder why. It could be for other reasons beyond them being scum, which is why they're both not solids in either camp.
Definitely. Him and Don need to talk more—based on what they say, I can be more confident on their standings.
I was aware Drago and you made a case against Nana, but I did not read it much before finishing my own post. More or less skimmed without looking into the details.
Yes. I still see her as town. I feel like with the potentially 6 hour difference between "Neutral" and "Bad" alongside Nana having gone back to earlier phases of the thread, we can chalk that up as a player changing their perspective more so than an inconsistency.
I feel like your "Random" bit is reaching, too.
I feel like Beta isn't playing to his meta? Nothing more to say, usually he's a lot more aggressive as a scum hunter. He has a suspect within the first 24 hours, and in the elongated day phase, it feels like he's just been passing on info and giving his thoughts here or there. Could be wrong, I'll admit he wasn't my biggest focus on the reread.
Queen just feels off due to her lack of presence. She's a very smart person and a good player. I guess I just expect more activity / solid results from the better players, and when I don't see that, I have to wonder why. It could be for other reasons beyond them being scum, which is why they're both not solids in either camp.
First of all, Celestia push on Ha reflects inconsistency highlighted by inconsistency in her reasoning.
Second, she didn't have only two pool of sus.
Her willingness to Lynch ha whom she put in neutral category despite having more prominent sus doesn't make sense.
You don't go after lynch on neutral player unless that neutral player made some slips later on to change your stance which didn't happen in case of HA.
This not "I am fine with lynching anyone"going on here
Second, she didn't have only two pool of sus.
Her willingness to Lynch ha whom she put in neutral category despite having more prominent sus doesn't make sense.
You don't go after lynch on neutral player unless that neutral player made some slips later on to change your stance which didn't happen in case of HA.
This not "I am fine with lynching anyone"going on here
Both of which have been explained.
And this hours difference in which she could have changed her mind on me from neutral to sus she herself never said that. According to her i didnt play any better from that point on (whatever that means) and thats why she sus me.
Ill be honest its giving me red flags how youve done that list. I get defending her fair enough but a lot of the board sus her actions and for you to put her that high up on the list with nothing putting you off on her does not sit right with me.
And this hours difference in which she could have changed her mind on me from neutral to sus she herself never said that. According to her i didnt play any better from that point on (whatever that means) and thats why she sus me.
Ill be honest its giving me red flags how youve done that list. I get defending her fair enough but a lot of the board sus her actions and for you to put her that high up on the list with nothing putting you off on her does not sit right with me.
Well, look at the time of that post to when she's now accusing him. The post where she makes her big case on Ha0 is 6-ish hours later, that's plenty of time to change her mind. I don't think that's a big inconsistency. People can change their mind and it seems like she reread the thread, given her quotes from Ha0.
Again. I don't agree with her lynch myself. But I don't think she's scum. The Salad thing is a fair point, to an extent. I only encountered it one other time but I don't think that's what's happening here if she has a only 2 people she'd be happy to kill.
Again. I don't agree with her lynch myself. But I don't think she's scum. The Salad thing is a fair point, to an extent. I only encountered it one other time but I don't think that's what's happening here if she has a only 2 people she'd be happy to kill.
D
@TheAncientCenturion her pool of lynches is definitely above two players.
It's a minimum of 3. 6 if you wanna count her suspicion on Rej, Red, and me.
It's a minimum of 3. 6 if you wanna count her suspicion on Rej, Red, and me.
We need to Lynch on day one to get info.
I hope everyone will cast vote today. We need reactions and to deduce voting pattern.
My vote will stay on celestia as to me she has made some prominent slips which I don't expect from an experienced player and I will prefer her Lynch over not so active don as it can give us better reads.
I hope everyone will cast vote today. We need reactions and to deduce voting pattern.
My vote will stay on celestia as to me she has made some prominent slips which I don't expect from an experienced player and I will prefer her Lynch over not so active don as it can give us better reads.
Its not the defending that i have a problem with ive already said thats fair enough. Its the way the list was layed out and high tac put her that seemed odd to me.
Youre mostly all more experienced on this game than i am so if yall did a list after reading through the play thats happened could you honestly put her that high up and be so adamant she isnt scum ? I know i couldn't.
Ive already said she may not be in the end but from an apparent experienced player her plays have been shit imo and its only raised sus on herself.
Youre mostly all more experienced on this game than i am so if yall did a list after reading through the play thats happened could you honestly put her that high up and be so adamant she isnt scum ? I know i couldn't.
Ive already said she may not be in the end but from an apparent experienced player her plays have been shit imo and its only raised sus on herself.
I might be done for the night, so unless there’s more information that comes to light between now and when the day officially ends...
Vote Lynch Bogard, I just don’t think he had any basis for going after TAC and his full-throated defense just felt like empty fluff...he’s adamant about not being seen as a liar, but he’s fine going after others for comparatively flimsy reasons without building a case for why HE should be believed.
Vote Lynch Bogard, I just don’t think he had any basis for going after TAC and his full-throated defense just felt like empty fluff...he’s adamant about not being seen as a liar, but he’s fine going after others for comparatively flimsy reasons without building a case for why HE should be believed.
- Status