Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Not only is this prejudiced,but this is also ignorant of brazilain history. Before the 70s,ccw without a permit wasn't even a crime and homicides were much much lower then they are right now. "A millenia of purging" means you think the average joe is an uncivilized idiot.
"But the US could". Yeah,they can because they are so much better,but we are animals for you right?
"My take from my visit".If this is your take away from your SINGLE visit to some random state in a country that could fit the entire of Europe in it,they i think you are not very smart.
"But the US could". Yeah,they can because they are so much better,but we are animals for you right?
"My take from my visit".If this is your take away from your SINGLE visit to some random state in a country that could fit the entire of Europe in it,they i think you are not very smart.
The thing is that there is no correlation between civillian gun ownership and increase or decrese of crime. You are the one that is saying that an unarmed civillian population is less likely to commit crimes,which is a fallacy because there are places that have very low gun legislation and low crime. What stops crimes is the application of harsh laws. Saudi Arabia: You rob you lose your hand.Guess what,no thiefs there!
[automerge]1707002459[/automerge]
No idea. Why not just hang them? It costs nothing at all.
[automerge]1707002459[/automerge]
No idea. Why not just hang them? It costs nothing at all.
Last edited:
.................... You're reading stuff that aren't there. Crime and corruption are hard to purge. I do not think people are different in any country at all. I do not think the US are great at all, no.
What, do you want me to visit and not draw any conclusions? LOL it's dangerous and that's simply the way it is.
I don't think I can answer this because it's a subject I often avoid because on this subject I'm a major fence rider.
I don't like the idea of people determining when someone else dies like they are god, but then I think there are crimes so horrible that a person forfeited their right to life, especially if said person they hurt is important to me.
I don't like the idea of people determining when someone else dies like they are god, but then I think there are crimes so horrible that a person forfeited their right to life, especially if said person they hurt is important to me.
.................... You're reading stuff that aren't there. Crime and corruption are hard to purge. I do not think people are different in any country at all.I do not think the US are great at all, no.
What, do you want me to visit and not draw any conclusions? LOL it's dangerous and that's simply the way it is.
.................... You're reading stuff that aren't there. Crime and corruption are hard to purge. I do not think people are different in any country at all.I do not think the US are great at all, no.
What, do you want me to visit and not draw any conclusions? LOL it's dangerous and that's simply the way it is.
Your statements remind me of this one time when my course visited a local company for career orientation, the woman presenting their work to us had overwhelmingly negative opinions on India, Indians and Indian culture despite having visited the country on work trips multiple times. Some people just can't get rid of their 1st world country elitism
I was talking about the act of winning. That's all you care about (even tho what you are not really doing that right now). If you wanted anything else, you would listen and not constantly affirming things without checking if you are right or not..
You are on a loop mate. Like a broken record, you keep repeating what you say without even listening to others and there is not even one atom of change in your repertory. Your point of view is doomed to fall into oblivion. Sorry.
Not even remotely close. But you don't even understand what you are saying, even when an actual women is telling you that you are going too far.
They do. That's why men are mainly in power in society.
That doesn't mean I have to listen to him. Its the difference between an expert making a claim and a random making a claim about a domain they are not an expert in. Like I told you. Its not about right or wrong. Its about who you trust to give you the right information.
Even a broken clock tell the right time two times a day. Anyone can say something true. It doesn't mean that they must be trusted to give overall correct information. This is why I choose to listen to scientist - people whom I believe have actual expertise - and not people who don't understand what they are talking about when talking about the reality of the world. EVEN if they are telling something that is true. Listening to anyone to give you the truth is the first step toward cultism.
Yes it was.
Feminist don't say that mate. The so called "mysandry" in feminism is a myth that was recently debunked.
Its both.
What make you say that healthcare for all delays the growth in medical breakthroughs ?
This was a rethorical question. Don't debate me on that or I will just report you once again. You vision is very similar to foundamentalism. You are sexist to the limit, I won't accept a debate on this subject with you.
Because forcing something on people is the definition of oppression.
And wanting to force something on women specifically in our patriarcal society is called sexism.
So you are basically advocating for an oppressive sexist society. Without mentionning that you are promoting the dangerous (and raped culture) ideas that women are actually seeking abuse.
This makes you dangerous. For women AND for men.
That's the right question.
The real answer is not that the few women are taken by abusive guys, the answer is that most men are potential abusers and women don't really have a choice.
The reality : We are educated in a system that is enabling us to become potential abusers. And your behavior is proving that you already have those ideas already implanted in you, which is proving my point.
Answer this and CLEARLY:
If feminists are the status co, why are feminists trying to change the system to have more equal rights and priviledges for women ?
I will keep repeating the question until you answer it. So you better not avoid it.
You are saying that adopted children are not "actual children" ?
Ask women for that. I'm sure they will give you a clear answer.
But really, if you don't understand why this sentence is sexist.. you are ... kinda screwed if you want to get into a relationship with a woman.
An advice for you : You might wanna change here..
That's the trick. Institutionnal racism or systemic racism are not about laws. If that was the case, there wouldn't be any racism in society left as wetend (in western societies) to get rid of racist laws.
Institutional racism is far more subtile and problematic than that. It comes from educations and choices made by members of the society. In multiple domains. Its the unwritten choices. The choices made out of biases.
This article will explain to you clearly how institutional racism works and where you can find it.
https://www.health.com/mind-body/health-diversity-inclusion/institutional-racism
You need to understand that this system is documented scientifically. People are researching that. Data are gathered and the reality is that people of color are still victim of systemic/institutional racism to this day.
"when* women.."
Not you are not, you are blaming women for that. And that the wrong way to look at the problem.
You should look wider, bigger, at the entire picture and not just the finger that is pointing toward women. You should look at the system that patriarchy is , understand it and try to fight it as this is the only way you will find reasons why men are currently in majority in term of suicide or why men are struggling in relationships.
But you prefer to look at the finger. You prefer to close your mind and listen to youtube gourous and other shapiros wannabee. This is pullling you deeper and deeper into toxic masculinism, far right and overall the deny and lack of understanding of reality.
Look !! You can't even read scientists researches papers without calling them bias ! You completely lost touch with reality. Its time for you to put aside your pride and wake the F up or you will lose yourself in the limbo of bigotry. I know what you are going through, I went through this myself.
So trust me when I say that you won't see a lot of guys like me that will try to pull you out of this blackhole of ignorance mate.
Because patriarchy is not only affecting women, its also affecting men.
That the secret ! Men are participating and gaining benefits in a system that are oppressing women and that also make them suffer.
No mate. Observation.
We live in a world were systemic racism is dominant in pretty much societies. There is no countries where white people are not educated with systemic racism. There are obviously exception, but those are not relevant when we are talking about a systemic problem.
All white/non racialized people have racist biases. Simply because we can't escape - at least until we do something about it - this type of education.
I'm literally using logic and scientic knowledge here mate.
No. Its simply wrong.
No you are not seeing the fact. You are seeing SOME facts and generalizing those fact to a much more complex and different situation. In reality, false accusations when we talk about abuse are a very low % of the reports. See as follow :
On what data reports or researches are you basing these affirmations ?
No, there would just be more murders.
Nop, its called pacifism.
They are definitely a cause for A kind of criminality tho.
Irrelevant essentialism.
Yes they can...
Yes, their mother can.
No and no.
Based on what data ?
Actually yes (if we are talking about gun violence at least) it is a scientific consensus:
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/scientists-agree-guns-dont-make-society-safer/
On what data are you basing this affirmation ?
Then provide those facts. Post the researches and data on the subject proving that guns actually make the society safer.
No you are right, it wasn't
No, just prevent young people to buy guns.
Calling an historical analysis paper "hot garbage".. mmmwokay... But hey, this is not the first time you are denying the legitimacy of the scientific process.
This has nothing to do with the actual subject.
Mate. What you don't understand, is that Hitler was voted in power. If there were to be some crazy lunatic like him running for power. You would see the danger only when it will be in front of you, threatenning the life of your family. Fascism is something that can be perfectly accepted by the population.
So you can say bye bye to your gun anyway, you won't have them when you realize you made the mistake of voting for a fascist.
You make it seems like every Brasilians are like you.. but no. This is wrong. Most Brasilian are actually educated on progressist subject and human ethics or sciences. All brasillians are not like you, don't worry, we don't think that way. Actually I think that there is an amazing progressist society emerging in brazil right now. I just hope they won't ask you for help to do that...
Systemic racism is a system that exist both in murica and europe sadly.
Even in water, try to shoot at water then
You are on a loop mate. Like a broken record, you keep repeating what you say without even listening to others and there is not even one atom of change in your repertory. Your point of view is doomed to fall into oblivion. Sorry.
Not even remotely close. But you don't even understand what you are saying, even when an actual women is telling you that you are going too far.
They do. That's why men are mainly in power in society.
That doesn't mean I have to listen to him. Its the difference between an expert making a claim and a random making a claim about a domain they are not an expert in. Like I told you. Its not about right or wrong. Its about who you trust to give you the right information.
Even a broken clock tell the right time two times a day. Anyone can say something true. It doesn't mean that they must be trusted to give overall correct information. This is why I choose to listen to scientist - people whom I believe have actual expertise - and not people who don't understand what they are talking about when talking about the reality of the world. EVEN if they are telling something that is true. Listening to anyone to give you the truth is the first step toward cultism.
Yes it was.
Feminist don't say that mate. The so called "mysandry" in feminism is a myth that was recently debunked.
Its both.
What make you say that healthcare for all delays the growth in medical breakthroughs ?
This was a rethorical question. Don't debate me on that or I will just report you once again. You vision is very similar to foundamentalism. You are sexist to the limit, I won't accept a debate on this subject with you.
Because forcing something on people is the definition of oppression.
And wanting to force something on women specifically in our patriarcal society is called sexism.
So you are basically advocating for an oppressive sexist society. Without mentionning that you are promoting the dangerous (and raped culture) ideas that women are actually seeking abuse.
This makes you dangerous. For women AND for men.
That's the right question.
The real answer is not that the few women are taken by abusive guys, the answer is that most men are potential abusers and women don't really have a choice.
The reality : We are educated in a system that is enabling us to become potential abusers. And your behavior is proving that you already have those ideas already implanted in you, which is proving my point.
Answer this and CLEARLY:
If feminists are the status co, why are feminists trying to change the system to have more equal rights and priviledges for women ?
I will keep repeating the question until you answer it. So you better not avoid it.
You are saying that adopted children are not "actual children" ?
Ask women for that. I'm sure they will give you a clear answer.
But really, if you don't understand why this sentence is sexist.. you are ... kinda screwed if you want to get into a relationship with a woman.
An advice for you : You might wanna change here..
That's the trick. Institutionnal racism or systemic racism are not about laws. If that was the case, there wouldn't be any racism in society left as wetend (in western societies) to get rid of racist laws.
Institutional racism is far more subtile and problematic than that. It comes from educations and choices made by members of the society. In multiple domains. Its the unwritten choices. The choices made out of biases.
This article will explain to you clearly how institutional racism works and where you can find it.
https://www.health.com/mind-body/health-diversity-inclusion/institutional-racism
You need to understand that this system is documented scientifically. People are researching that. Data are gathered and the reality is that people of color are still victim of systemic/institutional racism to this day.
"when* women.."
Not you are not, you are blaming women for that. And that the wrong way to look at the problem.
You should look wider, bigger, at the entire picture and not just the finger that is pointing toward women. You should look at the system that patriarchy is , understand it and try to fight it as this is the only way you will find reasons why men are currently in majority in term of suicide or why men are struggling in relationships.
But you prefer to look at the finger. You prefer to close your mind and listen to youtube gourous and other shapiros wannabee. This is pullling you deeper and deeper into toxic masculinism, far right and overall the deny and lack of understanding of reality.
Look !! You can't even read scientists researches papers without calling them bias ! You completely lost touch with reality. Its time for you to put aside your pride and wake the F up or you will lose yourself in the limbo of bigotry. I know what you are going through, I went through this myself.
So trust me when I say that you won't see a lot of guys like me that will try to pull you out of this blackhole of ignorance mate.
Because patriarchy is not only affecting women, its also affecting men.
That the secret ! Men are participating and gaining benefits in a system that are oppressing women and that also make them suffer.
No mate. Observation.
We live in a world were systemic racism is dominant in pretty much societies. There is no countries where white people are not educated with systemic racism. There are obviously exception, but those are not relevant when we are talking about a systemic problem.
All white/non racialized people have racist biases. Simply because we can't escape - at least until we do something about it - this type of education.
I'm literally using logic and scientic knowledge here mate.
No. Its simply wrong.
No you are not seeing the fact. You are seeing SOME facts and generalizing those fact to a much more complex and different situation. In reality, false accusations when we talk about abuse are a very low % of the reports. See as follow :
On what data reports or researches are you basing these affirmations ?
No, there would just be more murders.
Nop, its called pacifism.
They are definitely a cause for A kind of criminality tho.
Irrelevant essentialism.
Yes they can...
Yes, their mother can.
No and no.
Based on what data ?
Actually yes (if we are talking about gun violence at least) it is a scientific consensus:
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/scientists-agree-guns-dont-make-society-safer/
On what data are you basing this affirmation ?
Then provide those facts. Post the researches and data on the subject proving that guns actually make the society safer.
No you are right, it wasn't
No, just prevent young people to buy guns.
Calling an historical analysis paper "hot garbage".. mmmwokay... But hey, this is not the first time you are denying the legitimacy of the scientific process.
This has nothing to do with the actual subject.
Mate. What you don't understand, is that Hitler was voted in power. If there were to be some crazy lunatic like him running for power. You would see the danger only when it will be in front of you, threatenning the life of your family. Fascism is something that can be perfectly accepted by the population.
So you can say bye bye to your gun anyway, you won't have them when you realize you made the mistake of voting for a fascist.
You make it seems like every Brasilians are like you.. but no. This is wrong. Most Brasilian are actually educated on progressist subject and human ethics or sciences. All brasillians are not like you, don't worry, we don't think that way. Actually I think that there is an amazing progressist society emerging in brazil right now. I just hope they won't ask you for help to do that...
Systemic racism is a system that exist both in murica and europe sadly.
Even in water, try to shoot at water then