I quoted all important posts.
That’s an odd coincidence. I’m just trying to read you a bit, but you’re not making it easy.
Never got the notification, my bad should have checked regardless. I’ll read the pages soon ...
NeutralWatcher — He's pretty straight forward as a townie. Isn't saying much but has tried to stay on topic the entire game. Off his meta, I'm saying he's leaning town.
Rayan — His arguments with Fuji didn't amount to anything. He just insulted Fuji's picks / opinions on town but I don't recall seeing Rayan put anything of value in place or discuss anything. He popped in for that, and that's is. Pointless argument.
Mel — She's all fluff and some misunderstood points. Specifically at me, I recall her trying to "get me" when I took the ⅃ claim seriously. Overall gives me a negative feeling.
So you're saying it's not natural but it's according to his meta?
Ok, explain to me what is Gambit's town meta. I've never played with him as town before so I'm interested
Lol no
I’m 100% town😏
I’m still half asleep and skimmed through most of the pages
I have to read them again to come up with something
For now, she is neutral for me
TAC- I've got some problems with him lol. So, I didn't really like that he just jumped on Zara because he asked a genuine question about the setup. But later he said that his pushing was for reaction and some other stuff. So I give him that.
He also said that he likes betraying people but he is good. Like why would you say that? lol He mentioned multiple times that he plays always scummy and that is normal for him. I'm not really convinced by this, I have to say. I only played one game with him before and he was killed D1 but from judging that short experience, I think he MIGHT be scum but I'm not entirely sure yet. Since in that game he was co-operative/helpful etc. and he flipped scum. So this might be the case this time too since he has been answering questions etc
So, my sus list not in order:
TAC
Gambit
Poison
The only reason I clarified with TAC being neutral for me was because up to that point his posts and defense against Gambit was good in my opinion, but I wasn't going to town clear him for that, and since it's TAC. Thus, I put him in the neutral but explained why.
TAC - HS: obvious why I categorize him as being highly suspicious but something interesting to say is that when gambi told him it was suspicious of him and Zara for wanting a counter claim from the real L he thought it would be a good idea to reply to this by saying “Jokingly claiming L role is a bad move From gambit“ and he does not trust him being a townie for this reason ... IMO, He wanted to reduce town’s attention on Gumbi’s words who was accusing TAC for the last six pages but TAC only found a breather in the last page (14) by this small argument and he made it his main points argument against gambi. I find this As being pushed in a tight corner and hanging on to the only hop
At some point, I thought TAC is the closest for me to vote on, but after Kiwi’s Post, I did not feel the same.
Same, Kiwi’s post had some kind of magic in it that made me sus TAC less
The only reason why I don’t see TAC as sus as I had seen him before, is because Kiwi’s post got the man who accused TAC -> “Gambi” in a tight situation. I still won’t give TAC a townish pass just yet though.
Me neither but he is less sus now
My top suspects are:
Poison
Gambit
TAC
Cobra
I did read em Tac, i quoted you all back as well, bt i think you didn't get notified due to merged posts. Not just you, bt everyone engaged there.
Given L is most important role, its also expected they would want it confirmed or try to root out the real one, by calling Gambit the Real L. Your posts are on edge doing this same thing, along with Zara n Melon.
You really saying you fall for Gambit claim? Despite him saying he didn't say which L he was in very next post, bt here you were calling him L, confirmed townie.
It's good thing Real L didn't counterclaim. He shouldn't.
I think this is TAC's scum list
Rayan — His arguments with Fuji didn't amount to anything. He just insulted Fuji's picks / opinions on town but I don't recall seeing Rayan put anything of value in place or discuss anything. He popped in for that, and that's is. Pointless argument.
Gambit — Feels like he's blowing up my commentary about Zara or Queen into something way too large and nitpicking. I think my thoughts are clear on his posts. Paper thin and substanceless.
Mel — She's all fluff and some misunderstood points. Specifically at me, I recall her trying to "get me" when I took the ⅃ claim seriously. Overall gives me a negative feeling.
Poison — So, pleasant person to converse with. She seems nice. She has talked a lot and said literally nothing. She obsesses over game rules, then asks pretty benign questions that doesn't advance the game or gleam info from people. She's just floating around. My memory of her posts were of Poison being active and talking/questioning, so I didn't bother to think negatively of her.
But later he sus Yo Tan Wa and Kiwipom.
And also sus Reborn.
Didn't do anything to push the case on Rayan, Gambit, Melontonin and Poison who he thought sus.
Neutral is not Mafia!!!
Haha seriously ? You either didn't read my post or you are bad faith or scum. You never mentioned me in all of your reads and just like that I became a scummy target that did no contribution ?
If you remember wellI did some case against you no ? And I don't think I am the only one who noticed that you played in a funny way.
And show me where I "insulted" Fuji picks. I strongly disagreed with him about his reads but I don't remember saying things inappropriate.
No problem if you suss me because I didn't vote on anyone or if I don't push someone hard enough. But what you said was quite weak and weird.
Do you mean this post? Do you read them as town or scum?
@NeutralWatcher sorry i am stupid I thought it was your list but you talked about TAC list sorry....
Rayan don't give no reads on Tac. When Neutral posts Tac reads of Rayam, he is offended bt don't persue when he is told they were Tac reads. Nothing. The reaction also is off.
And Note:- Tac avoided giving reads on Rayan twice before finally giving it in list.
I might have missed this, what did you think about Gambit?
Nat is up there in my scum lean too but I think Gambit has a higher chance of flipping scum while Nat is just fluffing and not indicative enough yet for me to go with lynching her
On the TAC and Gambit stuff, I think both of them are scums. So I'm fine with lynching the two
Her reads are not bad per say. Bt on Tac, i find her reads weird. Almost like what she did last game phase with her scum buddies.
I barely read. My sus were nat/Zara and yo tan/light. NW town. Gambit null, TAC scum leaning.
Tac scum leaning but don't cast vote. She is less sus, based on their interactions.
one more point about why I’m not sure about TAC, he didn’t even respond or try to defend himself. He was MIA and posted a video about how he isn’t a crook. Like if he was scum, I feel like he would of said something
If you mean your case vs TAC, I already said I was going for TAC but dropped the entire thing after Kiwi’s post,
@Ali you keep on n on about Tac stuff, in most posts.
say let's leave TACy for tomorrow. He'll be easy to get rid of if he's scum.
Ok, so TAC for tomorrow, who for today?
?
If I’m gonna be honest, I don’t think we’re gonna catch him in this thread before EoD
?
I would rather lynch the less obvious ones like NW, Zara, Queen, Light.
Poison's reaction right now told me that she isn't scum, otherwise she wouldn't forget about us.
Queen and NW I understand but
How is Zara and Light the obvious ones?
?
Again, why is Light a safe lynch?
(Are you trying to kick him out of the mafia game so he can go rest without distraction? 😂 )
?
I think NW. Nat is more helpful atm, TAC is missing, Gambit seems alright to me now
I’m a bit skeptical about Poison because of how she automatically hinted at her role etc
Vote Lynch Neutralwatcher
?
To be fair I didn't have time to check all the pages I miss today, I lurked a bit but didn't have time (or the energy) to really put myself into the game, so my reads are still from yesterday. I just saw the part with Drago and Flower being "mansons".
So I don't think my vote here will be quite fair and normal. My principal suss yesterday were Melon and NW. But I didn't really checked the whole Gambit situation so voting against him now with any arguments is not really the best idea haha (if I do that Drago will shoot a bullet into my ass).
So I don't know : I either put a vote on Mel or NW or didn't vote for this DP.
Go for NW. As the person who started the Gambit case, I says we switch to NW.
?
Not really fond of lynching NW tbh. But I feel one of Gambit and NW is scum for sure given their argument.
Why not...
Vote NW.
Poison
But that one vote won't hurt her so I just left it on her
How I saw, she did pretty much nothing but fluff post and questioned a little NW but that's it
Oh?????? How so? I figured it was probably innocent, otherwise she'd play more carefully.
Previously I thought TAC and her are perfect scum buddies.
Me and Flower trying to lynch Gambit, then NW, then Nat and now back to Gambit maybe
Nat doesn’t want TAC lynched (today at least), she wants NW or Light. NW is really defensive and deflecting, Gambit and Nat are defending eachother (but they said they’re not!), no one else is here to sell me their case
Kiwi sussed Nat before. She is putting it as Nat decided so. Bt hiding she followed it blindly.
I wasn't expecting this lmao
My primary sus is Kiwi. She only targeted Gambit, no one else. No scum hunting. Half her replies are diplomatic, she is half convinced on Tac and consider natalija sus bt wants to Lynch as per her choice? She doesn't take initiative like a townie do but ask others, and I read most of her posts as deflecting from Tac at the end of day phase.
She make case on Gambit, and save herself with Miller claim.
Only point in her favour is, her composure is like her townie self.
I already explained Rayan.
Tris n Melon reads of Tac feels different than others.
I have limited posts per day. Read these well. Make what you can of it.