i mean that wasnt the question i asked about a specific situation.
flower just stated she wont vote up SK d1 cause hes a strong town player and so stubborn that he bans claims while he is host.
kekko had an argument with me how he never has and never will vote a top poster d1 moreso top 6-8 which at the time was an odd number to give cause SK was at top 8 then. no he had an easy persuasion of voting him.
he looks like weebs ekko to me so thats why im asking what are your thoughts on tweedle dee and dumb changing their minds so quickly and easily.
I don't think have particularly erudite reasoning on this, but I don't have any strong feelings about them being scum *because of the reasoning they gave around voting Soul*. I think they're scum for other reasons. In Flower's case, it's a bit strange, but I felt her original defence was worse, and if it came with the agenda of looking good after Soul's flip, she wouldn't have voted at all, so all in all it's just a bit *off*. Ekko's claim about not lynching top 6-8 players is something he has said before as town, but he's inconsistent with it, which plausibly could indicate him first attempting to use it as a tactic to stall before going for the bus. I can see them being team mates, and I think he looks worse than Flower does.
so if you dont acknowledge something they immediately didnt do it or you just create your own narrative instead of asking the question directly?
I did ask the question, I asked him to read it twice before concluding he hadn't. I mean, if I ask for something, and it's ignored, and I ask again, and it's ignored again, my assumption is going to be that they haven't done what I asked originally.
so why did you even spout any nonsense about you and SK beig mates, did you just out yurself?
I mean, what do you think? I asked because as far I knew, your position was "Ratchet or AL to be the lynch today!" - I had a pretty long interaction with SoulKiller, your scum read, so I was expecting some sort of observation from you.
